Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

More
14 Jan 2020 23:17 #251 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Which just goes to show how little you know about the pub trade then doesn't it or indeed any other trade for that matter either it seems

They have absolutely no rights to do that if they want then they would have to get a search warrant by the time they got back with it the disc would be snapped in two and the wipe button well and truly pressed.

You really do seem to be under the impression I give a [censored] what Plod think when I never have and never will.

Last time they had me in court I got fined twelve hundred quid and i.m proud of the fact that I .ve never paid a penny and don't intend to.

Magistrate called me a liar I just said whatever got up and walked out. I certainly didn't accept the authority of the court and before you start one of your rants I was represented in court that day by an employee of someone who used to post on these boards so I really would think twice before you make yourself look very stupid once again.


I fact there's a poster logged on here right now who can probably confirm the above for me right now.


I don't think you realize that you are the only one making yourself look stupid. You said they need a search warrant to seize footage. I have explained why that is incorrect, showing which legislation allows them to seize footage without a warrant if they feel it's going to be destroyed. It is a matter of fact, you are incorrect. Accept it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:23 #252 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:26 #253 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:28 #254 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Knacks wrote: Piglet you really now sound like a nob


Piglet is a knob that's the one thing about which there is absolutely no argument about.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:29 #255 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Knacks wrote: Piglet you really now sound like a nob


Piglet is a knob that's the one thing about which there is absolutely no argument about.


And yet you would still find something to argue about!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:44 #256 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


You clearly don't even realise that Plod can only enter licenced premises with the licence holders permission The Taxman actually has greater powers to do that than they do.

The only exemption is if there is a crime actually taking place at that very time they can enter to arrest the culprits but if my manager [ the license holder] refuses them access how would they know footage had been destroyed or indeed who did it ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:45 #257 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


You clearly don't even realise that Plod can only enter licenced premises with the licence holders permission The Taxman actually has greater powers to do that than they do.

The only exemption is if there is a crime actually taking place at that very time they can enter to arrest the culprits but if my manager [ the license holder] refuses them access how would they know footage had been destroyed or indeed who did it ?


Utter rubbish. You haven't got a clue. Deluded fantasist.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:50 #258 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

tommycoleman1 wrote: Do why are you not leading the march round the stadium, the protest inside the ground, the chants at the board etc Kes ?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Because she told us she's a steward with special responsibility for checking relevant matchday passes outside the boardroom.

But given what's been said since there's probably about as much truth in it as there is in her gender reassignment surgery that she must have had given the change of sex shes clearly been thru since then.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:53 #259 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

pacirv wrote: Might be worth getting up a petition and getting as many signatures as possible at matches and in town if enough people sign it would at least show the owners that the majority of fans are not behind them and their tenure. I believe the succession thing is still ongoing as well but not fast enough for most of us as the risk of relegation is growing alarmingly.


Rather than getting 5 thousand meaningless signatures better to get 500 who each pay a couple of quid to buy a full page in the ENS which shows the signatures along with a print of their names and any relevant position they might hold or how long they've been going etc etc.


"What paper would you like it in?"


As i said above the ENS Evening News and Star

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2020 23:53 #260 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

tommycoleman1 wrote: Do why are you not leading the march round the stadium, the protest inside the ground, the chants at the board etc Kes ?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Because she told us she's a steward with special responsibility for checking relevant matchday passes outside the boardroom.

But given what's been said since there's probably about as much truth in it as there is in her gender reassignment surgery that she must have had given the change of sex shes clearly been thru since then.


I've never said what gender I am Barry. Looks like you've been caught out yet again!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:03 #261 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.


I do know better 30 years of holding alcohol licences says that do

Just out of interest how long have you had your personal Licence for ?

You really should stop googling things thinking they apply when you.ve been told by someone who actually knows that they don't

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:06 #262 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.


I do know better 30 years of holding alcohol licences says that do

Just out of interest how long have you had your personal Licence for ?

You really should stop googling things thinking they apply when you.ve been told by someone who actually knows that they don't


But you don't know what you are talking about. You keep showing your ignorance when you get things incorrect.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:07 #263 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


You clearly don't even realise that Plod can only enter licenced premises with the licence holders permission The Taxman actually has greater powers to do that than they do.

The only exemption is if there is a crime actually taking place at that very time they can enter to arrest the culprits but if my manager [ the license holder] refuses them access how would they know footage had been destroyed or indeed who did it ?


Utter rubbish. You haven't got a clue. Deluded fantasist.


You really have surpassed yourself this time.

Some of this stuff is on page one of the multiple-choice paper for your personal licence.

Cant see you passing it and getting a licence anytime soon

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:09 #264 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


You clearly don't even realise that Plod can only enter licenced premises with the licence holders permission The Taxman actually has greater powers to do that than they do.

The only exemption is if there is a crime actually taking place at that very time they can enter to arrest the culprits but if my manager [ the license holder] refuses them access how would they know footage had been destroyed or indeed who did it ?


Utter rubbish. You haven't got a clue. Deluded fantasist.


You really have surpassed yourself this time.

Some of this stuff is on page one of the multiple-choice paper for your personal licence.

Cant see you passing it and getting a licence anytime soon


Ha ha!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:12 #265 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

tommycoleman1 wrote: Do why are you not leading the march round the stadium, the protest inside the ground, the chants at the board etc Kes ?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Because she told us she's a steward with special responsibility for checking relevant matchday passes outside the boardroom.

But given what's been said since there's probably about as much truth in it as there is in her gender reassignment surgery that she must have had given the change of sex shes clearly been thru since then.


I've never said what gender I am Barry. Looks like you've been caught out yet again!


Oh but you did and everyone on here knows that you did

And when I feel you've dug a deep enough hole the two relevant posts will appear on here.

At which point i will then be asking the mods to remove your profile for lying and deceiving the board membership.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • munchymagic
  • Away
  • Star Player
  • Star Player
More
15 Jan 2020 00:13 #266 by munchymagic
Replied by munchymagic on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Is BP the only job that you hold at the moment Kes or are you studying for something.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:18 #267 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

tommycoleman1 wrote: Do why are you not leading the march round the stadium, the protest inside the ground, the chants at the board etc Kes ?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Because she told us she's a steward with special responsibility for checking relevant matchday passes outside the boardroom.

But given what's been said since there's probably about as much truth in it as there is in her gender reassignment surgery that she must have had given the change of sex shes clearly been thru since then.


I've never said what gender I am Barry. Looks like you've been caught out yet again!


Oh but you did and everyone on here knows that you did

And when I feel you've dug a deep enough hole the two relevant posts will appear on here.

At which point i will then be asking the mods to remove your profile for lying and deceiving the board membership.


Yeah sure Barry, if you say so. Utter clown.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:20 #268 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Why do people put up with the shite Barry comes out with? Needs a permanent ban if you ask me.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:26 #269 by High Street
Replied by High Street on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Why? Because you disagree with him?
Sorry to break it to you, but people do have,and are allowed to have, different views to you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:29 #270 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.


I do know better 30 years of holding alcohol licences says that do

Just out of interest how long have you had your personal Licence for ?

You really should stop googling things thinking they apply when you.ve been told by someone who actually knows that they don't


But you don't know what you are talking about. You keep showing your ignorance when you get things incorrect.


Absolute Classic you really are going to look stupid In the morning

I suggest you send off for the personal Licence cramming folder all this really is page one stuff

Why don't you have a guess what I scored when I took mine [ Along with the licensee and his wife of a pub, not a million miles from BP as it happens ] in fact why don't you pop in and ask Micheal if what I have said is correct ?

Yeah, that's people like me who actually know under what circumstances plod can enter your pub and when they cant and have certificates like me to say that they know.

As i asked earlier how long have you held your personal licence for ? and what did you score in the multiple-choice section ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:32 #271 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.


I do know better 30 years of holding alcohol licences says that do

Just out of interest how long have you had your personal Licence for ?

You really should stop googling things thinking they apply when you.ve been told by someone who actually knows that they don't


But you don't know what you are talking about. You keep showing your ignorance when you get things incorrect.


Absolute Classic you really are going to look stupid In the morning

I suggest you send off for the personal Licence cramming folder all this really is page one stuff

Why don't you have a guess what I scored when I took mine [ Along with the licensee and his wife of a pub, not a million miles from BP as it happens ] in fact why don't you pop in and ask Micheal if what I have said is correct ?

Yeah, that's people like me who actually know under what circumstances plod can enter your pub and when they cant and have certificates like me to say that they know.

As i asked earlier how long have you held your personal licence for ? and what did you score in the multiple-choice section ?


As I have said, you simply don't have a clue and you can rant and argue all you want, it doesn't change the fact you are wrong. You look stupid every time you open your mouth.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:43 #272 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.


I do know better 30 years of holding alcohol licences says that do

Just out of interest how long have you had your personal Licence for ?

You really should stop googling things thinking they apply when you.ve been told by someone who actually knows that they don't


But you don't know what you are talking about. You keep showing your ignorance when you get things incorrect.


Absolute Classic you really are going to look stupid In the morning

I suggest you send off for the personal Licence cramming folder all this really is page one stuff

Why don't you have a guess what I scored when I took mine [ Along with the licensee and his wife of a pub, not a million miles from BP as it happens ] in fact why don't you pop in and ask Micheal if what I have said is correct ?

Yeah, that's people like me who actually know under what circumstances plod can enter your pub and when they cant and have certificates like me to say that they know.

As i asked earlier how long have you held your personal licence for ? and what did you score in the multiple-choice section ?


As I have said, you simply don't have a clue and you can rant and argue all you want, it doesn't change the fact you are wrong. You look stupid every time you open your mouth.


Yes of course I do

You're the one showing your ignorance luv

Once again you seem to have forgotten to tell us all how long you've held your personal licence for and what you scored on the multiple choice section.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:43 #273 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

High Street wrote: Why? Because you disagree with him?
Sorry to break it to you, but people do have,and are allowed to have, different views to you.


He is allowed to have a different view on matters of opinion yes, but this is a discussion about facts. This is the problem with society today, people seem to think if they "disagree" with a fact then that's just as valid a position to hold as the person who asserts the fact.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 00:46 #274 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.


I do know better 30 years of holding alcohol licences says that do

Just out of interest how long have you had your personal Licence for ?

You really should stop googling things thinking they apply when you.ve been told by someone who actually knows that they don't


But you don't know what you are talking about. You keep showing your ignorance when you get things incorrect.


Absolute Classic you really are going to look stupid In the morning

I suggest you send off for the personal Licence cramming folder all this really is page one stuff

Why don't you have a guess what I scored when I took mine [ Along with the licensee and his wife of a pub, not a million miles from BP as it happens ] in fact why don't you pop in and ask Micheal if what I have said is correct ?

Yeah, that's people like me who actually know under what circumstances plod can enter your pub and when they cant and have certificates like me to say that they know.

As i asked earlier how long have you held your personal licence for ? and what did you score in the multiple-choice section ?


As I have said, you simply don't have a clue and you can rant and argue all you want, it doesn't change the fact you are wrong. You look stupid every time you open your mouth.


Yes of course I do

You're the one showing your ignorance luv

Once again you seem to have forgotten to tell us all how long you've held your personal licence for and what you scored on the multiple choice section.


Yes you do. Utterly deluded keyboard warrior fantasist, that's all you are.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 01:57 #275 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote: Coke replied to Kessler there Mullen...


My apologies - thought it was NS - having eye trouble this week.

But the same applies to Kes, lead by example - in this day abs are you can’t rely on people to do it for you.


I am doing what I can, but ultimately if we want to have a chance of getting the BOD out we need as many people as possible taking part.


Sorry Kes, I did say I’d said my last word when I “called you out” last night. What you say above is “ I’m doing what I can”, what pray tell is that? I asked last night and got no answer! Are you saying you now know what you are going to do? If not, then , you’re all talk and little to no action. You constantly “called out” NS over claims he made about doing things yet here we are, you pushing for others to do things, saying you’re doing what you can but not actually offering anything? Is that not what they call hypocrisy? Hmmmmm?
So, here’s your chance to tell us all, what are you going to do? How are you any better than those who probably aren’t going to march, chant or boo?


Well to start with I don't put any money into the club. I know this is a difficult point for some because while a boycott would be the best way of showing the BOD how unwelcome they are, I understand that people still want to see their team. So if you don't want to boycott, you should go to the match but do lots of anti board chants to keep the pressure on them. I also ask questions at CUSG meetings. People say that isn't effective but I think it's important that they know fans will keep asking the difficult questions and that they are expected to answer. They need to realize they are accountable to us. I'm also still trying to get answers about an incident at the Northampton match last year, as I am not convinced about the version of events the club have given. I'm doing my best, but if we want to get the BOD out it really has to be a group effort, it can't just be a few individuals, we need to unite.


I think we all know they were lying thru their arses but no one involved was willing to call them out over it.

Why the hell would somebody make an accusation that something had happened and then simply disappear when you'd imagine they would have been all over the paper/radio/tv calling Pattison a shit and basically challenging him to prove that it never happened.


The point of asking questions about it was to give the club the opportunity to tell us their side of the story. Nigel said the CCTV didn't back up the accusation, but considering that Nigel was also named as being involved in the incident in a minor capacity I think it would have been more appropriate for the club to invite a third party to independently verify the footage. Any kind of potential for conflict of interest should be avoided.


Of course, it didn't back it up The disc will have been wiped or more likely corrupted within 10 minutes of the incident happening.

We used to do it regularly when I had the pubs as well as instructing the mangers to tell plod they had no knowledge of the system and would call the company out in the morning to download what they were after.


And stuff like this is why I know you're a bullshitter because if there is any suspicion of that, they would likely be taking your system away themselves and you would have no choice.


Not necessarily Kes - when I worked in a shop, sometimes on my own, I was always told not to give the police anything until speaking to the manager so he could view it. I didn’t stay there long as the manager organised an inside job break in - got done for it.


Technically they can just seize it anyway, but I don't think anyone would mind you checking with your manager first as long as you can give them a copy on a disc to take away. Barry specifically talks about footage being wiped though. If there's any concerns about that happening then he wouldn't be given a choice and they wouldn't be "asking" for footage, they would be coming and seizing the whole thing (S19 PACE)


UTTER [censored] BOLLOCKS

FOR A START THE CCTV IS ALWAYS PUT IN THE PRIVATE ACCOMMODATION WHICH GIVES THEM MAJOR ISSUES ON TOP OF WHAT THEYVE ALREADY GOT

IF YOU DESTROYED THE FOOTAGE ALL YOUD GET IS A VISIT FROM THE LICENCING OFFICER A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER TO SMACK YOUR HAND

THEY ONCE TRIED TO TAKE ONE OF MY MANAGERS TO COURT FOR DESTROYING A DISC. CPS THREW IT OUT BEFORE IT GOT ANYWHERE NEAR

www.lep.co.uk/news/latest/pub-closed-aft...footage-row-1-114866


I don't know about that case, but once again you are wrong. I have explained why you are wrong, but as usual you think you know better so I will leave it there. Have fun in your fantasy world.


I do know better 30 years of holding alcohol licences says that do

Just out of interest how long have you had your personal Licence for ?

You really should stop googling things thinking they apply when you.ve been told by someone who actually knows that they don't


But you don't know what you are talking about. You keep showing your ignorance when you get things incorrect.


Absolute Classic you really are going to look stupid In the morning

I suggest you send off for the personal Licence cramming folder all this really is page one stuff

Why don't you have a guess what I scored when I took mine [ Along with the licensee and his wife of a pub, not a million miles from BP as it happens ] in fact why don't you pop in and ask Micheal if what I have said is correct ?

Yeah, that's people like me who actually know under what circumstances plod can enter your pub and when they cant and have certificates like me to say that they know.

As i asked earlier how long have you held your personal licence for ? and what did you score in the multiple-choice section ?


As I have said, you simply don't have a clue and you can rant and argue all you want, it doesn't change the fact you are wrong. You look stupid every time you open your mouth.


Yes of course I do

You're the one showing your ignorance luv

Once again you seem to have forgotten to tell us all how long you've held your personal licence for and what you scored on the multiple choice section.


Yes you do. Utterly deluded keyboard warrior fantasist, that's all you are.


Simple answer then isn't there once again stick your address on here and I .ll arrange for things to happen.It.ll cost me 500 quid but in your case, believe me it will be an absolute pleasure.

But you won't because everyone on here knows who the keyboard warrior is you're the real keyboard fantasist said it before and I .ll say it again out of 1200 members on here not a single one has come forward to say that they know you in real life or for that matter even know of you and that says it all full stop. End of story.

Whereas there are literally hundreds of CUFC lads who know me and know who I am going back nearly 50 years including at least 4 past and present owners.

So I .ll tell you what why don't you just do everyone on here a favour and disappear back up your own arse where you came from.

But oh yes now I know it must be just an oversight on your part but once again you really do appear to have forgotten to tell us how long you've held your personal licence for.

And there my lord I rest the case for the prosecution.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • munchymagic
  • Away
  • Star Player
  • Star Player
More
15 Jan 2020 02:30 #276 by munchymagic
Replied by munchymagic on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
What if this protest that you are trying to organise gained momentum then it would attract attention from the media and they would want to speak to you Kes - would you be prepared to do so if that happened?

I also still find it hard to believe that after all this time your employers haven't sussed who you are yet just like a game of Guess Who?

If you want to be taken in the slightest bit seriously then you would have to reveal yourself to lend any credibility to your campaign.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 04:12 #277 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

munchymagic wrote: What if this protest that you are trying to organise gained momentum then it would attract attention from the media and they would want to speak to you Kes - would you be prepared to do so if that happened?

I also still find it hard to believe that after all this time your employers haven't sussed who you are yet just like a game of Guess Who?

If you want to be taken in the slightest bit seriously then you would have to reveal yourself to lend any credibility to your campaign.


If people don't want to take what I say seriously that's up to them. All I can do is explain what my concerns are about the current state of the club and ask people to consider what I'm saying and then judge for themselves whether they think I have a point or not.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 04:20 #278 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
From what I understand you agree with a lot of what I say about the BOD you just think I shouldn't be allowed to express it? Don't really understand that.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • munchymagic
  • Away
  • Star Player
  • Star Player
More
15 Jan 2020 05:12 #279 by munchymagic
Replied by munchymagic on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Do your colleagues know about you coming on here or do you act as a 'lone wolf'?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • melbourneblues
  • melbourneblues's Avatar
  • Offline
  • First Team Player
  • First Team Player
More
15 Jan 2020 07:22 #280 by melbourneblues
Replied by melbourneblues on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
I’m not sure anybody takes you seriously on here Kes, and as for asking for NS to be banned I’m sure most folk prefer reading what he has to say as opposed to your tedious shite.

Mullen is a virgin.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Bruntonpasty, lbtufty

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommycoleman1
  • Away
  • Ball Boy
  • Ball Boy
More
15 Jan 2020 07:59 #281 by tommycoleman1
Replied by tommycoleman1 on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Answer Munch's question Kes, if the protest took off & the media wanted to speak to you as one of the leaders of the protests ie ...
border news/ radio cumbria/ news & star would you be up for it ?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Bruntonpasty, munchymagic

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 09:44 #282 by markredfox73
Replied by markredfox73 on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Kessler just get into the paddock ..do what i did h9 up speak your mind...it pissed them all off...they have no morals... and see if that [censored] Pattison does the same thing by getting a heavy mob on you.. thing is i know if u went back almost 4 years now i would do the same thing again..and would continue to do it...

What has changed since then? Absolutely nowt just got worse and worse.

Some folk laughed at me that day getting flogged.. but they wont be laughing when we have no [censored] club anymore will they?
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Mullen103, Wukkie, NORTHERNSOUL, munchymagic

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 09:53 #283 by kells
The multiple quotes on this thread are ridiculous
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Bruntonpasty, Dancingbear

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • thetashkentterror
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
More
15 Jan 2020 09:56 #284 by thetashkentterror
Replied by thetashkentterror on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
So are 99% of the posts to be fair.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: nobbyblue, Bruntonpasty, kells

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:00 #285 by triskelionblue
Replied by triskelionblue on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
they were even having words with a Walsall fan at Walsall but as I told their fans than was lower league stuff to what they hear at Brunton Park

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:02 #286 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

markredfox73 wrote: Kessler just get into the paddock ..do what i did h9 up speak your mind...it pissed them all off...they have no morals... and see if that [censored] Pattison does the same thing by getting a heavy mob on you.. thing is i know if u went back almost 4 years now i would do the same thing again..and would continue to do it...

What has changed since then? Absolutely nowt just got worse and worse.

Some folk laughed at me that day getting flogged.. but they wont be laughing when we have no [censored] club anymore will they?


More people should criticize the BOD at matches but I think it's got to be done in a smart way. If you just shout abuse they have an easy excuse to kick you out and worse they actually come out looking better than you do, because they can just say we're happy to listen to criticism but we don't allow abusive language. What people should do is bombard them with a relentless stream of anti board chants, but keep it simple and non abusive just a clear message that they have to go. This would force them into a position where whatever move they make next is a win for you. They either have to allow the chants against them to continue, or they kick you out. And if they kick you out for non abusive criticism, thats directly contradicting what Nigel has previously said and they look bad for that.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:03 #287 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

tommycoleman1 wrote: Answer Munch's question Kes, if the protest took off & the media wanted to speak to you as one of the leaders of the protests ie ...
border news/ radio cumbria/ news & star would you be up for it ?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


I can't see how that would work, so probably not.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:05 #288 by triskelionblue
Replied by triskelionblue on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Soon FC Isle of Man will be in a higher Division than we are:

www.three.fm/news/isle-of-man-news/fc-is...earch-for-a-manager/

Makes sense that Philip Day took over Tynwald Mills ;-)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:10 #289 by CCU

triskelionblue wrote: Soon FC Isle of Man will be in a higher Division than we are:

www.three.fm/news/isle-of-man-news/fc-is...earch-for-a-manager/

Makes sense that Philip Day took over Tynwald Mills ;-)


We know, you started a Thread on it a while back!

www.thecumbrians.net/cufc-forum/main-for...d-isle-of-man#234377

;)

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:12 #290 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

melbourneblues wrote: I’m not sure anybody takes you seriously on here Kes, and as for asking for NS to be banned I’m sure most folk prefer reading what he has to say as opposed to your tedious shite.


So do you think he should be allowed to break the forum rules and threaten other people? Yesterday he said to me "Simple answer then isn't there once again stick your address on here and I .ll arrange for things to happen.It.ll cost me 500 quid but in your case, believe me it will be an absolute pleasure.". Why do the mods allow him to make threats like that towards other people in clear violation of the forum rules? The lad needs a permanent ban if you ask me, might learn him some manners for once.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:13 #291 by CCU
Bore off Kessler...

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Arragorn

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:13 #292 by seesaw50
Replied by seesaw50 on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
This thread has highlighted the problem of quoting posts with massive text content.....is it always necessary to quote.
Just throwing this out there

To have been born Cumbrian
is to have won the lottery of life !

The following user(s) Liked this post:: Dancingbear

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:14 #293 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

CCU wrote: Bore off Kessler...


So you are happy to allow users to break the rules and threaten others then?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:16 #294 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

seesaw50 wrote: This thread has highlighted the problem of quoting posts with massive text content.....is it always necessary to quote.
Just throwing this out there


That's why I prefer only quoting the bit I'm replying to but Barry threw another one of his sulks about that and apparently the mods prefer people to quote the entire thing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:16 #295 by CCU

seesaw50 wrote: This thread has highlighted the problem of quoting posts with massive text content.....is it always necessary to quote.
Just throwing this out there


Already under investigation if there’s a workaround!

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!
The following user(s) Liked this post:: seesaw50

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:18 #296 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

CCU wrote:

seesaw50 wrote: This thread has highlighted the problem of quoting posts with massive text content.....is it always necessary to quote.
Just throwing this out there


Already under investigation if there’s a workaround!


There is, allow people to just quote the bit they are replying to rather than quoting an entire nested chain of replies that aren't relevant. But no, apparently the wishes of Barry the manchild take priority.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:18 #297 by CCU

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote: Bore off Kessler...


So you are happy to allow users to break the rules and threaten others then?


It reads as an offer not a threat...

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:23 #298 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

CCU wrote:

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote: Bore off Kessler...


So you are happy to allow users to break the rules and threaten others then?


It reads as an offer not a threat...


Are you having a laugh? What he said is very clearly intended to be threatening. Threats can be implied as well as explicit and if you look at the content of what he's said, the intention is very clear. What I don't understand is why the mods allow him to behave like this.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:27 #299 by CCU

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote:

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote: Bore off Kessler...


So you are happy to allow users to break the rules and threaten others then?


It reads as an offer not a threat...


Are you having a laugh? What he said is very clearly intended to be threatening. Threats can be implied as well as explicit and if you look at the content of what he's said, the intention is very clear. What I don't understand is why the mods allow him to behave like this.


But you keep claiming NS is a fantasist? Someone who lives in a land of make believe?

Make your mind up Kes!

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Bruntonpasty

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:28 #300 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
You really are being ridiculous now CCU. An "offer" for what exactly, do you think by the context he was offering to have people come to my house for a meal? He was very clearly making a threat, which is against forum rules, and I can't understand why you are allowing him to do that. He needs a ban, at the very least he needs to back off with the stuff he's saying.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.748 seconds
Website and all content © Copyright 2020 TheCumbrians.net. All Rights Reserved.