Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

More
15 Jan 2020 11:28 #301 by Waltero
Replied by Waltero on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Kessler. I asked a question followed by Munchy regarding your employment status. Any chance of an answer. If you consider it an infringement of your human rights just say so
The following user(s) Liked this post:: munchymagic

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:31 #302 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

CCU wrote:

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote:

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote: Bore off Kessler...


So you are happy to allow users to break the rules and threaten others then?


It reads as an offer not a threat...


Are you having a laugh? What he said is very clearly intended to be threatening. Threats can be implied as well as explicit and if you look at the content of what he's said, the intention is very clear. What I don't understand is why the mods allow him to behave like this.


But you keep claiming NS is a fantasist? Someone who lives in a land of make believe?

Make your mind up Kes!


Fantasists can still be dangerous. I doubt he has the contacts he likes to suggest but if he had my address he could still be an irritant, making hoax calls, swatting etc. It's not appropriate for him to be asking people to post their address on here and making implied threats about what that will mean for them. Why do the mods continue to tolerate that kind of behaviour?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:32 #303 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Waltero wrote: Kessler. I asked a question followed by Munchy regarding your employment status. Any chance of an answer. If you consider it an infringement of your human rights just say so


I replied to you, check your spam.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:33 #304 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

melbourneblues wrote: I’m not sure anybody takes you seriously on here Kes, and as for asking for NS to be banned I’m sure most folk prefer reading what he has to say as opposed to your tedious shite.


So do you think he should be allowed to break the forum rules and threaten other people? Yesterday he said to me "Simple answer then isn't there once again stick your address on here and I .ll arrange for things to happen.It.ll cost me 500 quid but in your case, believe me it will be an absolute pleasure.". Why do the mods allow him to make threats like that towards other people in clear violation of the forum rules? The lad needs a permanent ban if you ask me, might learn him some manners for once.


ITS NOT A THREAT ITS A STATEMENT OF FACT

AND ACTUALLY NOBODY IS ASKING YOU WHY WOULD THEY WHEN YOU'RE TOTALLY UNWILLING TO VERIFY YOURSELF

Now apparently not only are you unwilling to verify your identity you're also unwilling to appear in front of the media

And Still, no sign of any answers to the questions that you were politely asked and I think you might find people would show you some more manners if you did them the service of actually answering their questions like all the normal genuine people on here do

Is there really still anyone on here who believes Kessler and her profile are for real ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • triskelionblue
  • Away
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
More
15 Jan 2020 11:34 #305 by triskelionblue
Replied by triskelionblue on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

CCU wrote:

triskelionblue wrote: Soon FC Isle of Man will be in a higher Division than we are:

www.three.fm/news/isle-of-man-news/fc-is...earch-for-a-manager/

Makes sense that Philip Day took over Tynwald Mills ;-)


We know, you started a Thread on it a while back!

www.thecumbrians.net/cufc-forum/main-for...d-isle-of-man#234377

;)


You can't have a life to have the time to dig that out!!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bruntonpasty
  • Bruntonpasty's Avatar
  • Offline
  • First Team Player
  • First Team Player
More
15 Jan 2020 11:34 #306 by Bruntonpasty
Replied by Bruntonpasty on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Kes = massive snowflake hypocrite

Ooh ban him! Dear god!!!

Called out again..... I think the quote was “ make your mind up”

Laughable really, and still inciting other people to do things you clearly won’t do yourself....

They don't like it up 'em!
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Arragorn

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:37 #307 by CCU

triskelionblue wrote:

CCU wrote:

triskelionblue wrote: Soon FC Isle of Man will be in a higher Division than we are:

www.three.fm/news/isle-of-man-news/fc-is...earch-for-a-manager/

Makes sense that Philip Day took over Tynwald Mills ;-)


We know, you started a Thread on it a while back!

www.thecumbrians.net/cufc-forum/main-for...d-isle-of-man#234377

;)


You can't have a life to have the time to dig that out!!!


Takes a few seconds using the Search facility! ;)

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:38 #308 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

melbourneblues wrote: I’m not sure anybody takes you seriously on here Kes, and as for asking for NS to be banned I’m sure most folk prefer reading what he has to say as opposed to your tedious shite.


So do you think he should be allowed to break the forum rules and threaten other people? Yesterday he said to me "Simple answer then isn't there once again stick your address on here and I .ll arrange for things to happen.It.ll cost me 500 quid but in your case, believe me it will be an absolute pleasure.". Why do the mods allow him to make threats like that towards other people in clear violation of the forum rules? The lad needs a permanent ban if you ask me, might learn him some manners for once.


ITS NOT A THREAT ITS A STATEMENT OF FACT

AND ACTUALLY NOBODY IS ASKING YOU WHY WOULD THEY WHEN YOU'RE TOTALLY UNWILLING TO VERIFY YOURSELF

Now apparently not only are you unwilling to verify your identity you're also unwilling to appear in front of the media

And Still, no sign of any answers to the questions that you were politely asked and I think you might find people would show you some more manners if you did them the service of actually answering their questions like all the normal genuine people on here do

Is there really still anyone on here who believes Kessler and her profile are for real ?


Are you being goady on purpose or are you just a bit thick Barry? You openly threatened me with violence and you can't understand why I won't give you my address. Why would I open myself up to the possibility of that, you really are a clown. You need a permanent ban, it might teach you some manners lad.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:39 #309 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Bruntonpasty wrote: Kes = massive snowflake hypocrite

Ooh ban him! Dear god!!!

Called out again..... I think the quote was “ make your mind up”

Laughable really, and still inciting other people to do things you clearly won’t do yourself....


Idiot.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:42 #310 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Bruntonpasty wrote: Kes = massive snowflake hypocrite

Ooh ban him! Dear god!!!

Called out again..... I think the quote was “ make your mind up”

Laughable really, and still inciting other people to do things you clearly won’t do yourself....


Not a snowflake. I'm happy for people to disagree with me, I just don't think forum users should be allowed to threaten others.


By the way Barry does your solicitor know you are making all these threats? I thought she told you to tone down what you say online.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • melbourneblues
  • melbourneblues's Avatar
  • Offline
  • First Team Player
  • First Team Player
More
15 Jan 2020 11:43 #311 by melbourneblues
Replied by melbourneblues on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Don’t be a hypocrite Kes, calling Barry a clown and thick is against forum rules.

Mullen is a virgin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:44 #312 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

melbourneblues wrote: Don’t be a hypocrite Kes, calling Barry a clown and thick is against forum rules.


Yeah whatever.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:53 #313 by Waltero
Replied by Waltero on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
The old excuse eh wonder where you got that from

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:56 #314 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

melbourneblues wrote: I’m not sure anybody takes you seriously on here Kes, and as for asking for NS to be banned I’m sure most folk prefer reading what he has to say as opposed to your tedious shite.


So do you think he should be allowed to break the forum rules and threaten other people? Yesterday he said to me "Simple answer then isn't there once again stick your address on here and I .ll arrange for things to happen.It.ll cost me 500 quid but in your case, believe me it will be an absolute pleasure.". Why do the mods allow him to make threats like that towards other people in clear violation of the forum rules? The lad needs a permanent ban if you ask me, might learn him some manners for once.


ITS NOT A THREAT ITS A STATEMENT OF FACT

AND ACTUALLY NOBODY IS ASKING YOU WHY WOULD THEY WHEN YOU'RE TOTALLY UNWILLING TO VERIFY YOURSELF

Now apparently not only are you unwilling to verify your identity you're also unwilling to appear in front of the media

And Still, no sign of any answers to the questions that you were politely asked and I think you might find people would show you some more manners if you did them the service of actually answering their questions like all the normal genuine people on here do

Is there really still anyone on here who believes Kessler and her profile are for real ?


Are you being goady on purpose or are you just a bit thick Barry? You openly threatened me with violence and you can't understand why I won't give you my address. Why would I open myself up to the possibility of that, you really are a clown. You need a permanent ban, it might teach you some manners lad.


We most real people when challenged give their address and say come on then big boy bring it on.

Only those with something to hide would behave in the way that you are

If the mods want to ban me then fair enough have I ever cried over it in the past ?

And besides, i.d soon be posting again using another profile

Now there's an idea why don't I create a profile for a person who doesn't really exist, have a change of sex, refuse to answer anyone.s questions, be unable or unwilling to very myself, have not one of the other 1200 members say that they know me or even that they know who I am and act like the biggest c*n@u*t this board or any of its predecessors has ever had.

Oooops i forgot Kessler has already done just that
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Arragorn

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 11:58 #315 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote: We most real people when challenged give their address and say come on then big boy bring it on.


Now, that's just idiots who feel they have to prove something.

NORTHERNSOUL wrote: And besides, i.d soon be posting again using another profile


No you wouldn't. Plus even if you were, you'd be easily discovered with your particular attitude and demeanor.

NORTHERNSOUL wrote: Now there's an idea why don't I create a profile for a person who doesn't really exist, have a change of sex, refuse to answer anyone.s questions, be unable or unwilling to very myself, have not one of the other 1200 members say that they know me or even that they know who I am and act like the biggest c*n@u*t this board or any of its predecessors has ever had.

Oooops i forgot Kessler has already done just that


More shite yet again.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:04 #316 by CCU
Thought you were going to stop split-quoting Kess?

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:07 #317 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

CCU wrote: Thought you were going to stop split-quoting Kess?


I'm not pandering to Barry and his manchild sulking

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:11 #318 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote:

seesaw50 wrote: This thread has highlighted the problem of quoting posts with massive text content.....is it always necessary to quote.
Just throwing this out there


Already under investigation if there’s a workaround!


There is, allow people to just quote the bit they are replying to rather than quoting an entire nested chain of replies that aren't relevant. But no, apparently the wishes of Barry the manchild take priority.


That's better now your starting to understand how the world works

But what I don't understand is how you can make threats against somebody who doesn't exist and is just the figment of someones deluded mind on a messageboard.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:18 #319 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote:

seesaw50 wrote: This thread has highlighted the problem of quoting posts with massive text content.....is it always necessary to quote.
Just throwing this out there


Already under investigation if there’s a workaround!


There is, allow people to just quote the bit they are replying to rather than quoting an entire nested chain of replies that aren't relevant. But no, apparently the wishes of Barry the manchild take priority.


That's better now your starting to understand how the world works

But what I don't understand is how you can make threats against somebody who doesn't exist and is just the figment of someones deluded mind on a messageboard.


Well maybe when you finish school and get into the real world you'll learn that your sulking doesn't take priority.

You know what frustrates me the most? The thought that the BOD could be having a good laugh at fans fighting among themselves rather than pointing the finger of blame at them. You annoy me more than most Barry because you're actually one of the few on here who seems to agree fans need to take direct action to get the BOD out. We don't agree on the method, you talk about violence and intimidation whereas I only advocate legal protest and boycotts. But we want the BOD out, I think most fans probably would agree with that aim. We all want the club to be successful. Let's focus on that, because if we fight among each other that's letting the BOD win.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:25 #320 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote: Kes = massive snowflake hypocrite

Ooh ban him! Dear god!!!

Called out again..... I think the quote was “ make your mind up”

Laughable really, and still inciting other people to do things you clearly won’t do yourself....


Not a snowflake. I'm happy for people to disagree with me, I just don't think forum users should be allowed to threaten others.


By the way Barry does your solicitor know you are making all these threats? I thought she told you to tone down what you say online.


Nothing at all to with it that only applied while I was on bail. And in the 6 weeks since then I .ve been having a good catch up including visiting the house of the plod I have an issue with and having a nice chat with his partner. I [censored] that bint in Mcr the other weekend as well as continuing to break the law every day in the running of my business.

So do you really think a run-in with a stupid fraudulent little shit on a message board will be of interest whatsoever to my brief who I understand this week is tied up with an attempted murder trial and the Mcr child abuse report I believe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:29 #321 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote: Thought you were going to stop split-quoting Kess?


I'm not pandering to Barry and his manchild sulking


Not sure how you work out that i.m sulking over anything ?

Well maybe just a little over Blackpool losing and [censored] up the best day out in a long time

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:48 #322 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Kessler wrote:

CCU wrote:

seesaw50 wrote: This thread has highlighted the problem of quoting posts with massive text content.....is it always necessary to quote.
Just throwing this out there


Already under investigation if there’s a workaround!


There is, allow people to just quote the bit they are replying to rather than quoting an entire nested chain of replies that aren't relevant. But no, apparently the wishes of Barry the manchild take priority.


That's better now your starting to understand how the world works

But what I don't understand is how you can make threats against somebody who doesn't exist and is just the figment of someones deluded mind on a messageboard.


Well maybe when you finish school and get into the real world you'll learn that your sulking doesn't take priority.

You know what frustrates me the most? The thought that the BOD could be having a good laugh at fans fighting among themselves rather than pointing the finger of blame at them. You annoy me more than most Barry because you're actually one of the few on here who seems to agree fans need to take direct action to get the BOD out. We don't agree on the method, you talk about violence and intimidation whereas I only advocate legal protest and boycotts. But we want the BOD out, I think most fans probably would agree with that aim. We all want the club to be successful. Let's focus on that, because if we fight among each other that's letting the BOD win.


The only person the board will be laughing at is you thinking well if that's the best they've got to throw at us we've nothing to worry about.

But the thing is like the rest of us they won't even be thinking your real and i.m pretty safe in saying that Steve Patt will have had the steward payroll checked and come to the same conclusion as the rest of us.

Now me i.m a completely different kettle of fish I .ve known Andrew Jenkins for 45 years and he is fully aware of my history as is at least one of his sons [ who I used to have a business relationship with ] Not least of which because I kicked off in front of them both in hospitality in Sunderland the first time we played at the SoL and Jenkins was present at the meeting where I spent 3 hours staring out Fred Story and calling him a [censored]. Patty knows full well all about me from when he used to try to tag on to us when we used to go out on the town on a Friday night up there with JC he got a bit of a shock when I showed him what was hidden under the seat of my Freelander one time.

So maybe Kes you can tell us about some of the interactions that you've had with either of those two over the years that you've known then [ other than being a pain and asking them for their passes every 5 minutes that is

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 12:53 #323 by tommycoleman1
Replied by tommycoleman1 on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
You can't see how it would work Kes, free publicity for 'the cause' why would you not want all the media outlets to interview you.... it's a win win situation

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 13:26 #324 by High Street
Replied by High Street on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Probably because if youre in hospital, then at least you wont be boring us all to death, posting on here.
I’ll chip in.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 14:54 #325 by markredfox73
Replied by markredfox73 on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Kessler ive read a few of your posts now ..come on stop being an absolute fanny diverting stuff away onto Barry .He has strong views always has and will continue to be controversial ..its the way it is ...

Go up to the directors box say your piece but dont shy away these folk have no morals anymore as we have seen...so why the hell should any pissed off fan show any respect for them . Get your views across and show them your distain

Stop the talk the talk and do as i suggested . If you get chucked out well [censored] them....if everyone did the same thing they would have no fans left apart from those who wont protest...
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Arragorn

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 16:17 #326 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

markredfox73 wrote: Kessler ive read a few of your posts now ..come on stop being an absolute fanny diverting stuff away onto Barry .He has strong views always has and will continue to be controversial ..its the way it is ...

Go up to the directors box say your piece but dont shy away these folk have no morals anymore as we have seen...so why the hell should any pissed off fan show any respect for them . Get your views across and show them your distain

Stop the talk the talk and do as i suggested . If you get chucked out well [censored] them....if everyone did the same thing they would have no fans left apart from those who wont protest...


I understand why you want to do it that way but I don't think it will work. Shouting abuse gives them an opportunity to come out of it looking better than you do. They can just come out and say we're happy to listen to criticism but that fan was being abusive and we don't allow that. And people actually sympathize with them. For me, I feel it's important to prevent them having any opportunity to get peoples sympathy. So if people gave them a relentless stream of non abusive anti board chants, they wouldn't have anywhere to turn. They would have to ether allow the chants to continue (which is a win for us) or start kicking people out which is also a win for us because then we'd have caught them in a lie, kicking people out for non abusive criticism which they have previously assured us is allowed. So basically they would be put in a position where whatever move they make ultimately benefits us.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 16:19 #327 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
I think they would start kicking people out, and that would erode their legitimacy because they would be called on to explain why they were ejecting people for non abusive criticism despite what Nigel has previous said about criticism being allowed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 16:43 #328 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote: I think they would start kicking people out, and that would erode their legitimacy because they would be called on to explain why they were ejecting people for non abusive criticism despite what Nigel has previous said about criticism being allowed.


And just who would be doing the kicking out then ?

Please don't tell me your doormen mates they.ll run a mile the minute somebody starts taking their badge numbers and identifying them and posting their names and where they work on here.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 18:07 #329 by Dancingbear
Replied by Dancingbear on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
FFS the way this is going set up a crowdfunder Barry, im sure therell be plenty takers so you dont have to fork out the full £500 yourself ;)

There's only one way of life and that's your own!!!
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Bruntonpasty

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bruntonpasty
  • Bruntonpasty's Avatar
  • Offline
  • First Team Player
  • First Team Player
More
15 Jan 2020 18:26 #330 by Bruntonpasty
Replied by Bruntonpasty on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote: Kes = massive snowflake hypocrite

Ooh ban him! Dear god!!!

Called out again..... I think the quote was “ make your mind up”

Laughable really, and still inciting other people to do things you clearly won’t do yourself....


Idiot.


Hello again Kes, Idiot here.....

I want to point something out to you that I find pretty poor....

It looks to me, and quite a few others I suspect, that since Barry returned to Posting, you've been doing your level best to provoke him into posting something that you could then ask for him to be banned for. Now Barry should know better than to bite but, that;s his choice. However, when the person goading him is the very person on here who purports to be of great virtue and morals, it really does start to stick in the craw to be honest, Like I say, pretty poor form and shows a particularly nasty manipulative side to you as a person.

I actually think you are a fake, I don't believe you're a steward at the ground at all, nobody seems to know who you are. Perhaps there are folks on here who wonder who I am? I have been posting for a long time now but probably only met one person in the flesh but, I do know of another person who probably would know me if we exchanged a few clues....

I await yet another tedious response or perhaps another insult?

They don't like it up 'em!
The following user(s) Liked this post:: melbourneblues, Dancingbear, Vogel, munchymagic

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 18:31 #331 by CarlisleWhite
Replied by CarlisleWhite on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Maybe everyone should just stop feeding the troll.
Quite clearly on a wind up, and seems to have history with NS for some reason, hence wanting him banned for being NS.
She/he/it is being so careful to avoid answering anything that will give even the slightest clue to their identity, which is a bit of a give away.
No idea what anyone would get out of this, but takes all sorts I suppose.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Bruntonpasty

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bruntonpasty
  • Bruntonpasty's Avatar
  • Offline
  • First Team Player
  • First Team Player
More
15 Jan 2020 18:41 #332 by Bruntonpasty
Replied by Bruntonpasty on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Thing is CW he/she/it is , it would appear to me at least, actively trying to get someone banned by purposely provoking them, really poor form, although old NS doesn't always help himself. I don't always agree with NS, i don't always believe his posts word for word, but I do know that he exists and is pretty much what he says he is. His presence on the board is interesting, Kes is just tedious.

They don't like it up 'em!
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Arragorn, CarlisleWhite

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 18:50 #333 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Kessler wrote:

markredfox73 wrote: Kessler ive read a few of your posts now ..come on stop being an absolute fanny diverting stuff away onto Barry .He has strong views always has and will continue to be controversial ..its the way it is ...

Go up to the directors box say your piece but dont shy away these folk have no morals anymore as we have seen...so why the hell should any pissed off fan show any respect for them . Get your views across and show them your distain

Stop the talk the talk and do as i suggested . If you get chucked out well [censored] them....if everyone did the same thing they would have no fans left apart from those who wont protest...


I understand why you want to do it that way but I don't think it will work. Shouting abuse gives them an opportunity to come out of it looking better than you do. They can just come out and say we're happy to listen to criticism but that fan was being abusive and we don't allow that. And people actually sympathize with them. For me, I feel it's important to prevent them having any opportunity to get peoples sympathy. So if people gave them a relentless stream of non abusive anti board chants, they wouldn't have anywhere to turn. They would have to ether allow the chants to continue (which is a win for us) or start kicking people out which is also a win for us because then we'd have caught them in a lie, kicking people out for non abusive criticism which they have previously assured us is allowed. So basically they would be put in a position where whatever move they make ultimately benefits us.


Well now we have it at last. Shes showing her true colours.

Basically what she's saying is don't do anything violent or against the law in relation to the odious three.

Dont get into the faces and lives and make them uncomfortable

Dont give them, their families any abuse

What she wants you to do is go on the car park and shout at the moon.

Now i wonder just who would benefit from all this ?

Right from the start i said who i think is behind it and today has simply made me certain

Step forward the one and only [censored] extraordinaire Mr Steve Pattison

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • munchymagic
  • Away
  • Star Player
  • Star Player
More
15 Jan 2020 18:57 #334 by munchymagic
Replied by munchymagic on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
I wouldn't want to get anyone the sack but if Kes is a fictional person masquerading as a steward and Nigel Clibbens reads this board then why hasn't he held an investigation yet?

It is possible that if Kes's plans came to fruition then the club would be asked by media and be forced to make a statement whether or not they were aware of said person.

Odd phrases like 'call you out' and 'Im not being bossy' would point to someone younger but in this case it could be anyone.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: melbourneblues

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 19:06 #335 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

munchymagic wrote: I wouldn't want to get anyone the sack but if Kes is a fictional person masquerading as a steward and Nigel Clibbens reads this board then why hasn't he held an investigation yet?

It is possible that if Kes's plans came to fruition then the club would be asked by media and be forced to make a statement whether or not they were aware of said person.

Odd phrases like 'call you out' and 'Im not being bossy' would point to someone younger but in this case it could be anyone.


Because he's a thick Yorkshire [censored] who does as he's told because he can't afford to lose the 75k a year that he currently stealing as a living from us.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 19:20 #336 by Mullen103
Replied by Mullen103 on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
I very much doubt Kessler is Steve Pattison due to the Cusg questions. I’d put it as less than 0.00000001%

At least we’re not Stockport

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 19:57 #337 by NORTHERNSOUL
Replied by NORTHERNSOUL on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Mullen103 wrote: I very much doubt Kessler is Steve Pattison due to the Cusg questions. I’d put it as less than 0.00000001%


I didn't say it Pattison posting. the content is way to well-constructed that that i.m talking about whos behind it

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 20:07 #338 by High Street
Replied by High Street on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts
Cant be Pattison. That thick [censored] can barely read or write. And far too calm-years of managing his brothers’ business has left him bitter and twisted.
Maybe his pal Colin Steel is posting on his behalf again, old Blueworld.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 20:07 #339 by Mullen103
Replied by Mullen103 on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: I very much doubt Kessler is Steve Pattison due to the Cusg questions. I’d put it as less than 0.00000001%


I didn't say it Pattison posting. the content is way to well-constructed that that i.m talking about whos behind it


But why make the person posting go on n on about the “Northampton incident” that just seems odd.

At least we’re not Stockport

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2020 22:45 #340 by Kessler
Replied by Kessler on topic Post-Plymouth Discussion - Owners & Boycotts

Bruntonpasty wrote:

Kessler wrote:

Bruntonpasty wrote: Kes = massive snowflake hypocrite

Ooh ban him! Dear god!!!

Called out again..... I think the quote was “ make your mind up”

Laughable really, and still inciting other people to do things you clearly won’t do yourself....


Idiot.


Hello again Kes, Idiot here.....

I want to point something out to you that I find pretty poor....

It looks to me, and quite a few others I suspect, that since Barry returned to Posting, you've been doing your level best to provoke him into posting something that you could then ask for him to be banned for. Now Barry should know better than to bite but, that;s his choice. However, when the person goading him is the very person on here who purports to be of great virtue and morals, it really does start to stick in the craw to be honest, Like I say, pretty poor form and shows a particularly nasty manipulative side to you as a person.

I actually think you are a fake, I don't believe you're a steward at the ground at all, nobody seems to know who you are. Perhaps there are folks on here who wonder who I am? I have been posting for a long time now but probably only met one person in the flesh but, I do know of another person who probably would know me if we exchanged a few clues....

I await yet another tedious response or perhaps another insult?


You're not an idiot bruntonpasty, sorry for saying that. Was just a bit frustrated. The BOD took over a decent club with attendances of 8k and knocking on the door of the championship. In a decade they've gone from that to attendances slipping under 4k, and struggling to stay in League Two. So my concern is that if that happened in a decade, what does the next decade hold for the club, will there even be a club in a decade? It's all very well to talk about succession at some point in the future but there is an urgency to this. Every week the club loses a few more fans and once those fans find something else to do on a weekend, they might not come back even once we get new owners. I think we need to get the BOD out. I'm sorry for calling you an idiot but I'm not sorry for saying there should be protests and that's an opinion I still stand by.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.546 seconds
Website and all content © Copyright 2020 TheCumbrians.net. All Rights Reserved.