The Brexit Thread

Dancingbear wrote: I really don’t see how May can stay in charge. It’s one [censored] up after another. If she hadn’t called another election she could have had all this sorted now. Still think I was right to vote leave but [censored] me these lot couldn’t do any worse if they’d tried.

CCU wrote: When I see this kind of Tweet, it makes me glad I voted Leave...

Martin Schulz ✔ @MartinSchulz

I want a new constitutional treaty to establish the United States of Europe. A Europe that is no threat to its memb… twitter.com/i/web/status/9…

07 Dec 2017 12:33

2350 Retweets 4281 favorites

• Reply
• Retweet
• Favorite

carwash wrote: There's been a lot of pressure on the Prime Minister not to damage the UK economy by forcing EU citizens to return home. The threat of Brexit has already cut net EU immigration dramatically. I think we might also see tougher action in the future to deport foreign criminals.

I'm quite optimistic we'll end up out of the European Superstate but still have people to work in the NHS and Costa Coffee.

mojo wrote:

carwash wrote: There's been a lot of pressure on the Prime Minister not to damage the UK economy by forcing EU citizens to return home. The threat of Brexit has already cut net EU immigration dramatically. I think we might also see tougher action in the future to deport foreign criminals.

I'm quite optimistic we'll end up out of the European Superstate but still have people to work in the NHS and Costa Coffee.

wonder what the workshy's excuse will be then when the option of 'coming over here tasking our jobs' is no longer an option as there won't be anyone coming over taking jobs?
maybe force some of them back into employment.

CCU wrote: I’m a Leave voter, but I’ve got no problem with anyone who’s moved here, got a job/studies at Uni, pays taxes etc, that’s the way of the world. Plenty Brits do similar around the World!

And it’s perfectly acceptable to me, that these folk will remain here. They moved when it was all above board. And likewise, our citizens around Europe will get the same treatment.

What I did vote for, was that when our tie is cut, we regain control of our Borders, Security, Laws etc, and do things for ourselves. I’ve no problem with any genuine Asylum seeker. The problem is in 99% of cases, there’s no way we’re the first safe haven they’ve reached! The open borders of Europe have seen people movement on an unprecedented scale this century, many unchecked, dangerous people amongst this tide.

This Country has been dragged down and it’s about time it was sorted out. Yes, it’ll take time, yes there’ll be bumps along the way, but it’ll be our Country once again, free from unelected politicians from the likes of Luxembourg making decisions for us.

It’s become almost frowned upon to be Patriotic, to love your Country. Why? What’s wrong with having a bit of pride in your flag and anthem? Boils my piss when folk deem you racist for doing so! Racist? Not likely...

The EU is slowly sinking ship, in years to come, folk will look back and go ‘Britain was right, wish we had’...

Could one of you Remainers spell out the reasons why you think we should stay in the EU? I’m genuinely interested.

Yours,

A senile little Englander!

thesilentone wrote: Jeeze, it's not only Whitehall that is full of Liberal, back stabbing, pro-European wets.

orfc wrote:

Alan wrote: you've got to also mention the treasurys assessment that over 800,000 jobs would be lost simply on a leave victory which never happened.

That was on leaving the EU, which we err... haven't actually left yet, hence all these talks and that

Alan wrote:

orfc wrote:

Alan wrote: you've got to also mention the treasurys assessment that over 800,000 jobs would be lost simply on a leave victory which never happened.

That was on leaving the EU, which we err... haven't actually left yet, hence all these talks and that

Keep posting pal one day you will get something correct .

www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.c...-referendum-job-loss

Markovitch wrote: Bear in mind while you are trying to have an intelligent conversation that it's Alan you are talking to. The man who brought turnips into a conversation about art

thesilentone wrote: Jeeze, it's not only Whitehall that is full of Liberal, back stabbing, pro-European wets.

Kangshung wrote:

thesilentone wrote: Jeeze, it's not only Whitehall that is full of Liberal, back stabbing, pro-European wets.

What i cant [censored] stand is brexiteers crying about being called 'thick' and 'racist', whilst having the nerve to label remainers as traitors, back stabbers etc etc.

Go sit on a Javelin.

Dancingbear wrote:

Kangshung wrote:

thesilentone wrote: Jeeze, it's not only Whitehall that is full of Liberal, back stabbing, pro-European wets.

What i cant [censored] stand is brexiteers crying about being called 'thick' and 'racist', whilst having the nerve to label remainers as traitors, back stabbers etc etc.

Go sit on a Javelin.

See what I don’t get is there was a vote with two options on it. I voted for one option other people voted for the other one. I don’t think since that day I’ve felt the need to call anyone a remoaner or a Brexiteer. What’s the point? The country voted the shit house priminister legged it and we’ve been left with a complete fiasco. If anyone’s to blame its Mr Cameron. As I’ve said before at least Milliband had the conviction to stick to his guns and say he wouldn’t have offered it.

carwash wrote: There's been a lot of pressure on the Prime Minister not to damage the UK economy by forcing EU citizens to return home. The threat of Brexit has already cut net EU immigration dramatically. I think we might also see tougher action in the future to deport foreign criminals.

I'm quite optimistic we'll end up out of the European Superstate but still have people to work in the NHS and Costa Coffee.

CCU wrote:

Armo wrote: Bit unfair on the likes of Greece and Italy where 99% of Asylum Seekers land no? It's not exactly like they're not struggling anyway.

Should of been % based worked out on population density and GDP (who's got the space and can afford it gets the most).

That’s why I said ‘genuine’. The TV images of working age young males with mobile phones pouring off boats were anything but asylum seekers!

carwash wrote: Ironically I think we are going to end up with a Goldilocks Brexit which is not too hard and not too soft which satisfies the average voter. EU migrants will be made to feel less welcome but we'll still have enough of them to do the jobs Brits don't fancy doing like picking vegetables or jobs at the minimum wage. We'll avoid being part of the European club but we'll hammer out a trade deal so that imports and exports carry on as before provided we meet the EU quality standards. I suspect it will only be at the fringes where we notice much difference but I think most people will accept it as the best outcome in the circumstances.

mojo wrote:

carwash wrote: There's been a lot of pressure on the Prime Minister not to damage the UK economy by forcing EU citizens to return home. The threat of Brexit has already cut net EU immigration dramatically. I think we might also see tougher action in the future to deport foreign criminals.

I'm quite optimistic we'll end up out of the European Superstate but still have people to work in the NHS and Costa Coffee.

wonder what the workshy's excuse will be then when the option of 'coming over here tasking our jobs' is no longer an option as there won't be anyone coming over taking jobs?
maybe force some of them back into employment.

Armo wrote:

CCU wrote: I’m a Leave voter, but I’ve got no problem with anyone who’s moved here, got a job/studies at Uni, pays taxes etc, that’s the way of the world. Plenty Brits do similar around the World!

And it’s perfectly acceptable to me, that these folk will remain here. They moved when it was all above board. And likewise, our citizens around Europe will get the same treatment.

What I did vote for, was that when our tie is cut, we regain control of our Borders, Security, Laws etc, and do things for ourselves. I’ve no problem with any genuine Asylum seeker. The problem is in 99% of cases, there’s no way we’re the first safe haven they’ve reached! The open borders of Europe have seen people movement on an unprecedented scale this century, many unchecked, dangerous people amongst this tide.

This Country has been dragged down and it’s about time it was sorted out. Yes, it’ll take time, yes there’ll be bumps along the way, but it’ll be our Country once again, free from unelected politicians from the likes of Luxembourg making decisions for us.

It’s become almost frowned upon to be Patriotic, to love your Country. Why? What’s wrong with having a bit of pride in your flag and anthem? Boils my piss when folk deem you racist for doing so! Racist? Not likely...

The EU is slowly sinking ship, in years to come, folk will look back and go ‘Britain was right, wish we had’...

Could one of you Remainers spell out the reasons why you think we should stay in the EU? I’m genuinely interested.

Yours,

A senile little Englander!

Bit unfair on the likes of Greece and Italy where 99% of Asylum Seekers land no? It's not exactly like they're not struggling anyway.

Should of been % based worked out on population density and GDP (who's got the space and can afford it gets the most).

High Street wrote: I’m pretty much of the same opinion as CCU. I voted leave, purely for the political connotations, not to repatriate Johnny Foreigner. I’d still rather we paid them piss all after we leave,although l recognise that the budgets are upto 2020 and may involve some stuff in the UK.

seesaw50 wrote:

carwash wrote: There's been a lot of pressure on the Prime Minister not to damage the UK economy by forcing EU citizens to return home. The threat of Brexit has already cut net EU immigration dramatically. I think we might also see tougher action in the future to deport foreign criminals.

I'm quite optimistic we'll end up out of the European Superstate but still have people to work in the NHS and Costa Coffee.

No mention of a halt date to EU nationals coming to the UK I note.....the transition is gonna take years

Laffy wrote: I’m pretty relaxed after the work and result achieved this week-the money was always going to be the hard part in my view.Like any divorce.

In contrast,both sides need a trade deal for all the reasons trailed-Basically we import more than export.On this basis, I think ,and I’m in the minority, that the trade deal will be easier.

In 5 years time we will be seen as a safe haven like the Swiss.Our currency might actually be too strong then

Laffy wrote: I’m pretty relaxed after the work and result achieved this week-the money was always going to be the hard part in my view.Like any divorce.

In contrast,both sides need a trade deal for all the reasons trailed-Basically we import more than export.On this basis, I think ,and I’m in the minority, that the trade deal will be easier.

In 5 years time we will be seen as a safe haven like the Swiss.Our currency might actually be too strong then

Markovitch wrote:

Laffy wrote: I’m pretty relaxed after the work and result achieved this week-the money was always going to be the hard part in my view.Like any divorce.

In contrast,both sides need a trade deal for all the reasons trailed-Basically we import more than export.On this basis, I think ,and I’m in the minority, that the trade deal will be easier.

In 5 years time we will be seen as a safe haven like the Swiss.Our currency might actually be too strong then

The chat from the eu people here in Munich is that the trade deal has already been outlined and it will remain as tariff free. The sting is that we will continue to pay our subs to be part of the free trade agreement but the amount of money coming back will be severely restricted as we will only be a partner nation. As for immigration it will simply remain as before. We are not a member of schengen so I haven't noticed it ranks highly with eu negotiating teams

Laffy wrote: Basically what Cameron was asking for....!