More parties at Downing Street have been discovered. One just before the Duke of Edinburgh's funeral and we all remember the picture of the Queen at the funeral.
Boris thinks that whatever he does will be alright in the end.
Could this have happened?
Senior adviser to Boris: "Is it all right if we have a party next week in the garden?"
Boris, "No problem, as long we remember to apologize afterwards."
The most interesting thing about the Boris parties is that not one single person, anywhere, in all the multitudes of parties ever said, I'm not coming because I'm frightened I'll get sick. Not one had an old mum at home on an iron lung? So the people with the best information in the country knew it was bollocks, the risk of attending a party was zero.
Russia is not going to invade Ukraine, what for? The Americans need a war, $775bn a year on military expenditure, you can't maintain that unless you use some of it. The EU is accelerating the EU army, Ukraine will be a base for the Americans going forward
I voted Tory in the last GE and probably always will. I didn’t vote for John Stevenson (not a fan), I didn’t vote for Boris Johnson (untrustworthy), I voted for the Conservative Party and for their ideology of rewarding hard work and enterprise. That is the top and bottom of it, I wasn’t gullible, I wasn’t lied to, I’m not stupid, I voted for them because I wanted to vote for them, they’re the party which most closely mirrors my own outlook on life.
Having said that, I’m not one of those blinkered disciples who defends the party no matter what and sees no wrong. Boris has sailed close to the wind a few times during his term but this latest misdemeanour is a step too far, the vast majority of rational thinking people will agree. However, there still appears to be a few (including on here) who, astoundingly, are still trying to defend him. An act nearly as embarrassing as Boris’s own attempt at justifying his glaring hypocrisy.
There are 2 ways to look at Ukraine. As a territory to conquer, there is nothing there. The only reason would be to appease the Russian people. When the USSR broke up Gorbachev was promised NATO would not come to the border of Russia. Obama while putting American paid troops there gave them only defensive weapons. Trump changed that. If America seeks to place rockets that can reach Moscow, Russia may move to defend her borders. As the US would do if Russia put rockets in Canada or Mexico. The wildcard is that Biden owns a whole huge area of eastern Ukraine round Poltava, so he isn't going to want a war on his patch.
China India and Russia are developing a joint military strategy. I don't see Russia and China as rivals. Basically China has manufacturing capacity, Russia has raw materials. Kazakhstan has moved away from Russia culturally in the last 15 years, if they join or work with BRICS I don't think there is any need to do anything. The big Asian area where the US can make political gains is Myanmar, that gives them a foothold between India and China, and the people actually want them.
There are 2 ways to look at Ukraine. As a territory to conquer, there is nothing there. The only reason would be to appease the Russian people. When the USSR broke up Gorbachev was promised NATO would not come to the border of Russia. Obama while putting American paid troops there gave them only defensive weapons. Trump changed that. If America seeks to place rockets that can reach Moscow, Russia may move to defend her borders. As the US would do if Russia put rockets in Canada or Mexico. The wildcard is that Biden owns a whole huge area of eastern Ukraine round Poltava, so he isn't going to want a war on his patch.
China India and Russia are developing a joint military strategy. I don't see Russia and China as rivals. Basically China has manufacturing capacity, Russia has raw materials. Kazakhstan has moved away from Russia culturally in the last 15 years, if they join or work with BRICS I don't think there is any need to do anything. The big Asian area where the US can make political gains is Myanmar, that gives them a foothold between India and China, and the people actually want them.
Other than one of the largest in the World with the ability to produce food.
There are 2 ways to look at Ukraine. As a territory to conquer, there is nothing there. The only reason would be to appease the Russian people. When the USSR broke up Gorbachev was promised NATO would not come to the border of Russia. Obama while putting American paid troops there gave them only defensive weapons. Trump changed that. If America seeks to place rockets that can reach Moscow, Russia may move to defend her borders. As the US would do if Russia put rockets in Canada or Mexico. The wildcard is that Biden owns a whole huge area of eastern Ukraine round Poltava, so he isn't going to want a war on his patch.
China India and Russia are developing a joint military strategy. I don't see Russia and China as rivals. Basically China has manufacturing capacity, Russia has raw materials. Kazakhstan has moved away from Russia culturally in the last 15 years, if they join or work with BRICS I don't think there is any need to do anything. The big Asian area where the US can make political gains is Myanmar, that gives them a foothold between India and China, and the people actually want them.
Other than one of the largest in the World with the ability to produce food.
Russia is the world's largest wheat exporter
Bad day for Bojo. Starmer has the initiative, let's see if he can do anything with it.
Bad day for Bojo. Starmer has the initiative, let's see if he can do anything with it.
I’m afraid Starmer doesn’t need to do anything. Every day BJ spends as PM takes Labour closer to victory at the next GE. The party is ripping the PM to shreds, and the foundations of the ‘red wall’ are being rebuilt as we speak.
For the good of his party - and his country - Johnson needs to take the advice dished out by David Davis… “in the name of god, go”