TheCumbriansNet RT @bbccumbriasport: ON THIS DAY: 1966 | 18,678 at Deepdale saw Shrewsbury beat Carlisle 4-3 in a second FA Cup Third Round Replay https://…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @officialcufc: Full interview with former-Blue Tony Hopper in this weekend's match day programme #cufc https://t.co/lkqnOPAmbq
14hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @officialcufc: The @EFL have released details of next season's fixture schedule: https://t.co/jW21lVYncb https://t.co/sOnQtyTAvt
18hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @playmaker_EN: 🔄 Most comeback wins in League 2 (16/17): 5: 💪CARLISLE 4: Portsmouth 3: Morecambe, Cambridge, Stevenage, Luton, Doncaste…
18hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @officialcufc: Ticket information for the trip to @Only1Argyle: https://t.co/393Kx3K6Si
21hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @officialcufc: The ticket office and reception telephones are now both working again - thank you for your patience this morning #cufc
21hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @joncolman: Carlisle have their promotion mojo back - and Jamie Proctor is one of the main reasons. Report from Wycombe: https://t.co/Pd
21hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @joncolman: Keith Curle, sent to the stand at Wycombe, says his only crimes were "banter" and "verbals" with the home bench: https://t.c…
21hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @joncolman: Keith Curle: Carlisle fans have "no excuse" not to turn up in their numbers for massive Portsmouth game: https://t.co/ku2zcw
21hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @officialcufc: We have a very special guest for the @officialpompey game on Saturday. Please come along and say hello: https://t.co/xcYV
24hreplyretweetfavorite
TheCumbriansNet RT @officialcufc: Thank you for your patience and our apologies for any inconvenience caused.
TheCumbriansNet RT @officialcufc: Unfortunately we are affected by a local telephone issue which is preventing incoming & outgoing calls. We will update as…
TheCumbriansNet RT @bbccumbriasport: ON THIS DAY: 1993 | Carlisle United were 6-0 down by half-time at Bury in a Fourth Division fixture at Gigg Lane https…
TheCumbriansNet RT @joncolman: This was the goal I mentioned in column yesterday. A beauty from Tony Hopper against Motherwell. https://t.co/ujpYWgdc04
TheCumbrians.net CUFC Forum
  • Forum

  • Visit Now!
  • Over 1000 members
  • Breaking News
  • Match Discussion
Carlisle United Current Squad Information
Carlisle United Current Season Information
TheCumbrians.net Player Sponsorship
  • Player Sponsorship

  • Make a donation
  • Sponsor Shaun Miller
  • Win Home Shirt
  • Win Away Shirt
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: 48 Team World Cup.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 15:31 #1

  • ParcelPete
  • ParcelPete's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1277
  • Likes received: 683
Wasn't sure if this was a good idea at first but after seeing the format i think it will make for more exciting games.
16 groups of 3 with the top 2 in each group going through to the last 32 knock out,even world minnows like Scotland might qualify.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 15:40 #2

  • CCU
  • CCU's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 4171
  • Likes received: 1450
There will be a Group P at the 2026WC. Ridiculous...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Win or Lose, Up The Blues!

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 15:47 #3

  • sirjimmyglass
  • sirjimmyglass's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
  • Posts: 567
  • Likes received: 217
You saw what happened with the European Championships last summer what happens when you open the competition up too much. Dreadfully boring football with teams just trying to avoid defeat in order to scrape through the group stages. That'll absolutely happen with a WC of 48 teams.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Arise, Sir Jimmy

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 15:51 #4

  • ParcelPete
  • ParcelPete's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1277
  • Likes received: 683
Only 16 more games played than there are now and the winner will still have to play 7 games,on the downside it will make FIFA even more dosh.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 15:53 #5

  • cufcmike
  • cufcmike's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 521
  • Likes received: 253
I've heard people say its good because "It gives the smaller countries a better chance of qualifying" but on that aspect, I disagree. Surely its 1000x more special for them to qualify via the traditional format? Some nations might not be in it for a few decades, but you should only be in the world cup on merit. This cheapens it for me.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 15:54 #6

  • pedals
  • pedals's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Ball Boy
  • Ball Boy
  • Posts: 121
  • Likes received: 112
I can't see how it's a good thing in the slightest. On the one hand it's meant to make the World Cup more accessible, but it's an elite football tournament - if you're not good enough, you're not good enough. It makes a further mockery of the whole qualification process and cheapens the footballing value of getting to the finals, but of course increases the financial value of the whole thing, which is all they really care about here.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Wukkie, cufcmike

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:00 #7

  • ParcelPete
  • ParcelPete's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1277
  • Likes received: 683

pedals wrote: I can't see how it's a good thing in the slightest. On the one hand it's meant to make the World Cup more accessible, but it's an elite football tournament - if you're not good enough, you're not good enough. It makes a further mockery of the whole qualification process and cheapens the footballing value of getting to the finals, but of course increases the financial value of the whole thing, which is all they really care about here.


Why not make the F A Cup only for the best 32 teams then.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:02 #8

  • Kangshung
  • Kangshung's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
  • Posts: 593
  • Likes received: 121
12 groups of 4 would be better. The winners of each group plus the four best place runners up going through into a last 16. This would force teams on to the offensive, giving a far more entertaining tournament - in theory at least.

Not profitable enough for the bar stewards in charge though.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last Edit: by Kangshung.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:05 #9

  • ParcelPete
  • ParcelPete's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1277
  • Likes received: 683

Kangshung wrote: 12 groups of 4 would be better. The winners of each group plus the four best place runners up going through into a last 16. This would force teams on to the offensive, giving a far more entertaining tournament - in theory at least.

Not profitable enough for the bar stewards in charge though.


Or keep it at 16 groups with only the winner going through to the knockout stage.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Kangshung

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:07 #10

  • Kangshung
  • Kangshung's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
  • Posts: 593
  • Likes received: 121

ParcelPete wrote:

Kangshung wrote: 12 groups of 4 would be better. The winners of each group plus the four best place runners up going through into a last 16. This would force teams on to the offensive, giving a far more entertaining tournament - in theory at least.

Not profitable enough for the bar stewards in charge though.




Or keep it at 16 groups with only the winner going through to the knockout stage.


Hadn't even considered that!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last Edit: by Kangshung.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:09 #11

  • Zebby
  • Zebby's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
  • Posts: 955
  • Likes received: 396
I can see the next thing being the major countries with the big financial clout getting qualification automatically so as to maximize profitabilit

Money grabbing twatts

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Up The Blues

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:22 #12

  • pedals
  • pedals's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Ball Boy
  • Ball Boy
  • Posts: 121
  • Likes received: 112

ParcelPete wrote:

pedals wrote: I can't see how it's a good thing in the slightest. On the one hand it's meant to make the World Cup more accessible, but it's an elite football tournament - if you're not good enough, you're not good enough. It makes a further mockery of the whole qualification process and cheapens the footballing value of getting to the finals, but of course increases the financial value of the whole thing, which is all they really care about here.


Why not make the F A Cup only for the best 32 teams then.


Because the World Cup is designed as an elite tournament and the best 32 teams play in the finals as a result of a two-year long qualifying campaign to determine who plays there on merit. Domestic cup competitions are designed to include teams from right the way down the pyramid and ultimately end up with the best 32 teams in the latter stages anyway, with a few anomalies each year. They're two different systems that work well on their own and don't need to be altered.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Yorkie Blue

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:23 #13

  • heilkmoon
  • heilkmoon's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Youth Team Player
  • Youth Team Player
  • Posts: 405
  • Likes received: 184
No surprise to see Scotland are in favour of it!

A 48 team Finals will be bad enough, but how tedious and meaningless will most of the qualification fixtures be?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:31 #14

  • sirjimmyglass
  • sirjimmyglass's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
  • Posts: 567
  • Likes received: 217

pedals wrote:

ParcelPete wrote:

pedals wrote: I can't see how it's a good thing in the slightest. On the one hand it's meant to make the World Cup more accessible, but it's an elite football tournament - if you're not good enough, you're not good enough. It makes a further mockery of the whole qualification process and cheapens the footballing value of getting to the finals, but of course increases the financial value of the whole thing, which is all they really care about here.


Why not make the F A Cup only for the best 32 teams then.


Because the World Cup is designed as an elite tournament and the best 32 teams play in the finals as a result of a two-year long qualifying campaign to determine who plays there on merit. Domestic cup competitions are designed to include teams from right the way down the pyramid and ultimately end up with the best 32 teams in the latter stages anyway, with a few anomalies each year. They're two different systems that work well on their own and don't need to be altered.


Quite amazing that you had to spell out the difference there. The magic of the FA Cup is that in theory you or I could end up playing for our local club against Premier League teams in front of tens of thousands of people. The magic of the World Cup is that it is a collection of the world's best teams, pitting it out against each other, not the best teams and anyone who can beat Andorra and San Marino in qualifying.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Arise, Sir Jimmy

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 16:38 #15

  • ParcelPete
  • ParcelPete's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1277
  • Likes received: 683

sirjimmyglass wrote:

pedals wrote:

ParcelPete wrote:

pedals wrote: I can't see how it's a good thing in the slightest. On the one hand it's meant to make the World Cup more accessible, but it's an elite football tournament - if you're not good enough, you're not good enough. It makes a further mockery of the whole qualification process and cheapens the footballing value of getting to the finals, but of course increases the financial value of the whole thing, which is all they really care about here.


Why not make the F A Cup only for the best 32 teams then.


Because the World Cup is designed as an elite tournament and the best 32 teams play in the finals as a result of a two-year long qualifying campaign to determine who plays there on merit. Domestic cup competitions are designed to include teams from right the way down the pyramid and ultimately end up with the best 32 teams in the latter stages anyway, with a few anomalies each year. They're two different systems that work well on their own and don't need to be altered.


Quite amazing that you had to spell out the difference there. The magic of the FA Cup is that in theory you or I could end up playing for our local club against Premier League teams in front of tens of thousands of people. The magic of the World Cup is that it is a collection of the world's best teams, pitting it out against each other, not the best teams and anyone who can beat Andorra and San Marino in qualifying.


You could just as well say the magic of the World cup is that a Postman from Gibralter could play against Brazil in front of tens of thousands.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 17:08 #16

  • ukblue
  • ukblue's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 171
  • Likes received: 73
I've always been up for an expansion.. they've only done it for coin but it makes it better for the lads who go and watch their team... the Iceland and Northern Irish lads in France will never forget the summer they had last year. Even with a 24 team world cup you would get games like South Korea v Iran. You can always just watch something else on TV.

There should be more than an extra 3 European teams though.. There are about 20 new countries in Europe since 1990 and lots of them are now decent footballing sides.

The 3 team leagues is a farce.. unless it just went to a knock-out stage of 16. You'd think penalty shoot outs is a thing that they'd want to try to reduce.. not increase. If you know who you will play in the next stage you will have games where both teams after drawing their final game will want to lose the penalty shoot out.

The European Teams should start their own tournament with 20 teams... invite 6 from South America and open up a competition for qualifiers for 6 from the rest of the world... or something similar with 48 teams.. make it all non-profit.. and tell FIFA they don't want anything to do with them.

Don't know why people are mentioning Scotland.. they couldn't qualify for a 24-team European tournament last year. They are currently 5th out of 6th in the World Cup Qualifiers... expanding the European qualifying places from 13 to 16 makes no difference to them at all.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: ParcelPete

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last Edit: by ukblue.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 17:20 #17

  • pedals
  • pedals's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Ball Boy
  • Ball Boy
  • Posts: 121
  • Likes received: 112

ParcelPete wrote:

sirjimmyglass wrote:

pedals wrote:

ParcelPete wrote:

pedals wrote: I can't see how it's a good thing in the slightest. On the one hand it's meant to make the World Cup more accessible, but it's an elite football tournament - if you're not good enough, you're not good enough. It makes a further mockery of the whole qualification process and cheapens the footballing value of getting to the finals, but of course increases the financial value of the whole thing, which is all they really care about here.


Why not make the F A Cup only for the best 32 teams then.


Because the World Cup is designed as an elite tournament and the best 32 teams play in the finals as a result of a two-year long qualifying campaign to determine who plays there on merit. Domestic cup competitions are designed to include teams from right the way down the pyramid and ultimately end up with the best 32 teams in the latter stages anyway, with a few anomalies each year. They're two different systems that work well on their own and don't need to be altered.


Quite amazing that you had to spell out the difference there. The magic of the FA Cup is that in theory you or I could end up playing for our local club against Premier League teams in front of tens of thousands of people. The magic of the World Cup is that it is a collection of the world's best teams, pitting it out against each other, not the best teams and anyone who can beat Andorra and San Marino in qualifying.


You could just as well say the magic of the World cup is that a Postman from Gibralter could play against Brazil in front of tens of thousands.


Nations like San Marino and Lichtenstein get to play in front of tens of thousands every qualifying campaign anyway and they lose 5 or 6-0 more often than not. Whilst you could say it would be 'magic' to watch them lose 6-0 to Brazil on a sweaty afternoon in Bahrain or wherever, it does nothing to increase the standard of football and narrow the disparity. Not that those kind of teams will get through, but you know what I mean. All that will happen is the same teams will do well, the teams that wouldn't have been there will get knocked out and the rich get richer. Let's not pretend this decision has anything to do with football.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 17:55 #18

  • Armo
  • Armo's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
  • Posts: 537
  • Likes received: 212
Absolutely crazy.

IF Andorra get there on merit, they should enjoy the experience, not get there because the competition is open to every man and his dog - fly half way around the world, setup a base camp, fans fly in and then it's all over after two games. Can these countries really afford that?

Also, with the WC in countries like Qatar, they'll need, say, 12 world class stadiums? 11 white elephants covered in tumbleweed and a national stadium? Not really much of a legacy that like. 48 base camps? Of course that won't be a problem.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 19:03 #19

  • franksidebottom
  • franksidebottom's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1405
  • Likes received: 591
Just dilutes the competition in my eyes. Haven't read how the extra qualifying places will be distributed amongst continents but I'd imagine there'll be extra places for Asia and CONCACAF both of whos current final qualifying places are usually filled by crap countries meaning that even crapper countries will be there, great. Can't wait to see a country which Saudi Arabia beat in qualifying get dicked 10-0 by Germany.

This 3 team group is rubbish aswell. What's the chances you'll be able to pick the two teams to qualify from the majority of groups with ease. How will a group of Germany, Sweden and Bahrain with 2 to qualify be exciting?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 20:04 #20

  • Wukkie
  • Wukkie's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1359
  • Likes received: 553
I can only express my feelings about expansion with one symbol - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re:48 Team World Cup. 10 Jan 2017 23:50 #21

  • loser
  • loser's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Reserve Squad
  • Reserve Squad
  • Posts: 713
  • Likes received: 590
It'll make it more embarrassing for England when we get beat by even smaller countries than Iceland. Should be a laugh.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
The following user(s) Liked this post:: cufcmike

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re:48 Team World Cup. 11 Jan 2017 07:47 #22

  • DeckchairBlue
  • DeckchairBlue's Avatar
  • Offline
  • First Team Player
  • First Team Player
  • Posts: 1720
  • Likes received: 364
People are being short sighted if they think its only for financial reasons.

It's a massive power grab by Infantino to make sure the smaller nations vote for him on mass at the next elections and he can secure his place at the top.

People thought there would be change once Blatter left, but it's just as corrupt and always will be.
The following user(s) Liked this post:: Yorkie Blue

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re:48 Team World Cup. 14 Jan 2017 21:01 #23

  • Wukkie
  • Wukkie's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Bench Warmer
  • Bench Warmer
  • Posts: 1359
  • Likes received: 553
Who are these people who thought there would be change? I haven't met anyone yet.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.390 seconds
Go to top