TOPIC: ONE MAN PROTEST

Shit. I've just chucked two carrier bags of them out. Still got 4 brewing buckets of them though.

I like the idea of Mark as Fans Rep. The board wouldn't know what to do if he was elected and it would be a strong message to them.

chorleybluehoss wrote:
More than likely him and Mullen would be filed under B, regardless of credits!

Are you admitting the vote is rigged?

Well done MRF. Plenty of support for you where i was in the paddock. Completely over the top the way you were manhandled. I think you should ask the police for the copy of the video evidence they filmed of you ( and us ) Still, be aware some police forces have a habit of losing video evidence as we well know.

Definitely worth a shot as standing as fans rep. No doubt they will bar you as not a fit and proper person but it would just make them look even more stupid. Please consider giving it a go.

Hope your arm isn't too sore!

This will go on until direct action takes place.

Get organised, boycot the directors businesses, social media campaign responding to everything official sent out by the club.

What gets me is why did it not kick off when Mark was thrown out or other continue shouting at the board?

These lot are worse than Knighton. Knighton was off his rocker, these lot know what they are doing.

So your saying the votes rigged Stu, not surprised so they don't get an anti board rep.

No chance me or mark will get anyway near the 4. I'd imagine the club will cancel this position before that happened!

Was in the Paddock with my 6yr old nephew . Police video camera pointed straight at us - they obviously see a man with Parkinson's and a small boy as possible threats - Mr Nixon and Mr Jenkins should feel embarrassed at the heavy handed nature of their response to genuine protest .
I think their idea of a "silent majority" who support their incompetence was shown to be a pile of s#£t.

well done mark good on yer fella

Fair play Mark the Red Fox

I'll send Dekka round yours tonight with an extra chop as a reward

He's been a loose cannon since that wedding carry-on.

Well done MRF
But what gets me is why Ste Pat felt the need to come out of the directors box and into the paddock at half time i was outside and had walked past you while you were giving nixon some stick . Maybe theres a call to the FA about a director (or what ever he is now ) coming down and causing trouble with the fans

He went to the Control Room apparently...

Of course he did. Cowardly [censored].

Are they charging you Mrf with an offence...or were you just told to" go away "

Dumped outside and that was it.

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

We all know it was the work of big man who decided to get the lynchmob

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

Could see you on your phone after the heavies left you standing at the shop!

Yep that was wukkie phoning me

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

markredfox73 wrote:
Should have dumped on Nixon's bonnet.

J33 PAT. Thats the 4x4 you should have dumped on. Or poured brake fluid over.

Couldnt care less about their cars. I care they have damaged our club beyond repair

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

Well done MRF.

At least the paddock and main stands chants gave them another earful after mrf "left" the building

I'll be knocking up a few souvenir t shirts to commemorate the 'Red Fox Rising'

£10 each

50% of the profits will go towards keeping MTRF in sherbet dips and dib dabs during the close season

Huge admiration for you mate, most of us would be flairt of getting lifted. Definitely get a letter of complaint sent off to the club regarding your treatment. This is still a free country and providing you stayed within the law, you should have been left alone. The plod obviously didn't deem it an arrestable offence. Good on yer!

Foul and abusive language counted as breach of the peace init? Lucky boy!

With this N&S; interview that Jon Colman has asked you for mark, how many Mullen references are you gonna drop?

I admit I was wrong Mark, I thought you were just a ranter on here using daft words like fuckwittery but you did actually do something. Fair play.

However..as a Father myself..

Resident Blue - were you happy that your 6 year old nephew heard those words?

A 6 year old will hear worse in the playground

Tell me what is worse.

I'm not having a go here by the way, I give him credit but had I taken my 6 year old, and when I go I go in the Paddock, I would be thinking about how heroic this was.

Just after a view.

There is far far worse on the tv, in films, in music and at schools than that. They all also in general will have a far greater influence on a child than seeing a supporter show some passion, given perhaps the swearing is a little offensive to some but I think your being abit PC about it.

Waterworks wrote:
And if you think about it the kid would have to know they were bad words in the first place for any damage to be done.

Otherwise when he asks you what Cu nt means you just tell him " a very bad man "

Funnily enough my 6 year old boy isn't allowed to watch film or tv with those words in.

I agree on the school part but he is taught that this is not acceptable by me. If I say let's go to the footy and he hears it then that is different. He's not been taken yet and I do expect swearing there, but perhaps not to that extent and cheered.

Anyway - I am on Mark's side, I was after a view as I said!

I defiantly see where your coming from but as you will known bad language and sometimes passion boiling over to anger supporting any football club will always be present, especially when it's Carlisle United

Waterworks wrote:
Especially with these fukcing c*nts in charge..

NORTHERNSOUL wrote:

Id probably say John Nixon

Ibogaine wrote:
"RED FOX RISING"..... The name of a new Consortium to give us back our club?!!

Lakelandterrier wrote:

He's heard worse , the most important thing is that he knows the difference between what is and is not acceptable in public

Tom wrote:
His Mam and Dad are OK with me taking him - he has a season ticket (yes , they're free) so is a regular. I know he's heard "bad" language at school because he's come out with it , quite innocently, at home. The difference is knowing , as you said , what the words mean and when (if there is a perfect time) and where to use them (without getting beaten up and/or arrested). I will continue to take him to games as I did with my own children (now 25 and 29) I will not be driven into the "Family areas" as I believe they are dull , soul destroying places. My daughter did suggest a silent sit-down protest - that way , at a predetermined time in a game chosen for effect , we , those standing all simply sit down and don't say a word , you could even gkare at the board of idiots ..........then we all get back up after say 2minutes and carry on as normal ?
Just an idea...........

I thought there already was a silent protest at every home game.

melbourneblues wrote: Thanks mb , you're absolutely right , of course , apathy rules at Brunton Park !