CCU wrote:
Jelly - Would you let an outsider appoint key positions within your business, without seeing proof of investment? That's why I ask if the £1.26m was ready to go so to speak. If we were at the point where AL was ready to appoint a new MD etc, surely the £'s must've been in position ready for their appointments? The suggestion that is being banded about by a few folk, is that the BoD had asked for such assurances, and they weren't exactly forthcoming. If so, then regardless of what we all think, they were within their right to move the goalposts to protect the business - Any business would likely do the same in that position, regardless of public perception.
I'm only asking so we can either substantiate or put to bed these rumours that have come from the business community in North Cumbria...
No, I probably wouldn't let an outsider make such a key appointment, though it would depend on how confident I was in the thing going ahead. AJ and JN made that choice. I still don't get this obsession with Lapping having the £1.26m all ready to go - he has never suggested that he has got that ready to go, just expressed a confidence that he would be able to get to that figure.
I don't agree that they are within their rights to move the goalposts. I think they were within their rights to demand certain assurances and if they were not forthcoming then they were right to agree but I don't think they were right to lead people along and then change the rules of the game (if that is what happened). The other thing, surely the proposed takeover wouldn't actually take place without the funds becoming available when needed - you can't say you will invest £1.26m into a business in exchange for a share restructure and revised holdings and then expect it to go ahead when you don't have the cash.
One final thing, the current directors don't appear to shy in having a go at Andrew Lapping for whatever reason. I find it extremely unlikely that they would be reticent to criticise them publicly. By saying they had significant doubts about the funds actually being in place they could have given everyone a perfectly reasonable explanation for the delay. In coming up with this new investor they then appear to be trying to discredit Lapping via their business network - something entirely in keeping with their snidey, underhand methods.
I don't know Lapping from Adam but I do know that I trust him far more than I would ever trust Nixon or Jenkins for the simple reason that he has given me no reason not to trust him, while I wouldn't trust those two no matter what they told me based on their recent track record.