Blustone wrote:
Considering there is a confidentiality clause I think they answered as much as they could. No fan of them, but they did.
Clearly they though Andrew did not have the money.
Rubbish!
Is two conversations with the bloke's agent in over 3 weeks good enough? I don't think so. Are vague statements which amount to less than nothing good enough? I have worked with all kinds of businesses over the past 20 odd years, all over the country and I have never come across one of comparable size to the club which is run so pathetically and shambolically. Those two fools are an utter disgrace, and that statement is clearly not the truth.