TOPIC: When will this club communicate!!!!!!....Claire time to represent us.

So the Lapping deal was thrown out due to a reported better offer. This whole ordeal is even more of an embarrassment then MAMKAR and the puppet on Knightons string - the curry house owner. We are the best part of a year since the billionaire smokescreen and still we have had nothing of any substance from the club that should be re named silence United.

How can the clubs leadership get stroppy about the heat they get from the fans and media when they continue to treat us like mushrooms. If they were transparent, communitactive, and professional - which they are non of, then they would have a point if fans and media even dared to ask very relevant questions, the same questions that any clubs fans would want answered.

If we were a private business, the Director of external affairs who would surely be responsible for external communication would have been sacked long ago. But of course, turkeys don't vote for Christmas.

Claire, as a paying customer to this shambles, the supporters are long overdue a solid, factual statement on this entire event. Again, if CUFC was a listed private enterprise we would have been prosecuted for fabrication in order to raise the share price of its own company by communicating potential buyers but then not publically concluding the interest either way. Business's simply can't do that in this day and age (unless you are a corner shop.....mmmm the irony)..so why should we have to put up with it? This can't go on and the BoD need to be told that the customers of this club are entitled to the truth emmediatlely. The made up confidentiality agreement is not relevant as we are not expecting names and shoe size of these pretend people so they cannot hide behind that as a reason for not keeping us up to date. At the end of the day, you cannot protect the identity of someone who doesn't exist but you can use the confidentiality clause to cover up the fact that it was a fabrication......happy to be proven wrong of course but how can we believe to be true in the absence of documented, factual, evidence based communications - something our club specialises in.

The time has long since passed where forceful and continued pressure needs to be applied to these incompetent people. They are laughing at us as King Curle and the lads have done their job on the pitch (brilliant btw), however this has played out to their plan A of not taking much to distract the mushrooms. How would we all be feeling if we were bottom of the league - the pressure and demands for answers would be far higher so regardless of the great job they boys are doing, the pressure on our incompetent custodians needs to ratchet up and Claire, I'm sure I speak for a lot of fans who want this taken up through your goodself.

The fans rep is a smokescreen. She dances to the tune of the directors. The election was rigged in her favour.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

I don't buy that loser, but perhaps this is a task to prove which of us is right?

How long has she been in the role now?

All that seems to have happened is the answering of a few, mostly, pointless questions...

Joined the trust during the knighton years. Then gave up and left when it soon became apparent they were not representing the fans interests. With what's gone on at the club over the last few years, couldn't believe how quiet and mute the trust have been. What is the point of a trust that won't represent the fans and speak out about against the board?
When is the board going to release a statement and admit the billionaire was all a lie?

Here here. The farce has gone on far too long.

Has anyone been up from the paddock at all before the floods and asked them in the directors box for a direct answer???

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

markredfox73 wrote:
If you try and challenge the directors from the Paddock they just ignore you, apart from Ste Patt who will stand there with horrible smug smirk on his face and wink at you most of the time.

markredfox73 wrote:
If you try and challenge the directors from the Paddock they just ignore you, apart from Ste Patt who will stand there with horrible smug smirk on his face and wink at you most of the time.

markredfox73 wrote: Yeah had a go at Ste Patt after the Keith debacle (which the fans rep has nicely allowed him to brush under the carpet - good job Claire!). And then there was the match where we went dressed as billionaires, was great seeing how uncomfortable they looked trying to pretend we weren't there while everyone was howling.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

spaffhead wrote:
It was smart watching them trying to ignore the billionaires a couple of months ago.

spaffhead wrote: No wonder the prick got headbutted that time when he was reffing Sunday League. Assaulting match officials is an abhorrent thing to do... Except in this case. No idea what happened but I know it was fully justified!

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

loser wrote:
No one should get violence at them whoever they are, but I was assistant once to SP in a youth final and I felt like head butting him.

we were 2 very young lads at the time starting out and SP overruled all our decisions, although correct, and it turned into a farce.

loser wrote:

The lad done time for it should have waited for him in the car park.

I think the flood may well of been convenient for more than one party.

Takes a lot of pressure off and lends a convenient excuse/justification for any lack of progress.

ParcelPete wrote: That's an injustice like. He should have been getting an award for services to the community.

They must understand they are discredited in future if they do not make some sort of announcement over the infamous Billionaire.

No one believes much from what they are told by the Club, however it would be a real shame for the likes of AJ ending his time at CUFC under such a silly Cloud.

Like him or not, his heart has been with CUFC (and his cash)

I had a lot of time for AJ and felt he was simply too trusting of people like JN which has been his downfall.

I hope he can start to see that if he truly did have the best interests of the club at heart then he would be stepping aside for a new generation.

FFS can all you lot not give it a rest, just for a bit like. F*cking twine, f*cking twine. We've heard it for christs' sake, just leave it for a bit lads eh. The club is in a bit of a state and regardless of what we do or don't think is going on, can we not, for now, just support everyone who is trying to get our club back into some kind of workable state.
You know at some stage you have got to give credit where credit is due. The team are being allowed to stay down south friday to wednesday, f*ck knows how much that is costing the club but all you lot are bothered about is f*cking twining. Believe it or not we've all heard it . Get out, get a few pints and for f*cks sake get a life!
.

Nope.

Yes thats right... sweep it all under the carpet ... why should we leave it. The farce has gone on long enough since they shafted the Lapping deal with a story theyve never come clean about .. why let it go??

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

OldCarliol wrote:
Ah that is why it is going to cost 3 million to rebuild they are spending the money staying away. Don't get me wrong but his is what they should of been doing for years!

markredfox73 wrote:
No, not sweep it under the carpet.Just for now, of all times give it a rest. This one particular subject is getting so tiring. We can fire it back up again when the club gets sorted but believe it or not lads, at this time we have to put our faith in these people, without them the club drowns, quite literally. It is the people who you are actively slagging off who are turning up every day at BP putting all their effort into sorting out the mess so that you and I can watch our team again and go back to slagging those same people off. Oh and I'm just a bit surprised at you spaffhead, Now, at least we should give them just a bit of space. Battle can and no doubt will, resume in a few months but if we want a team to watch in the future then we need to support them however hard that may seem to some of you. SO, FFS give it a rest.

Nope.

Why now of all times anyway?

generalbluev66 wrote:

Armo wrote:

Armo wrote:
FFS, yeah really convenient. What an idiotic comment.

"Give them space.".. they hide away anyway and have employed puppets to deal with media while they continue to hide away (space ) an embarrasing lie from the fans.

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

Mashie Niblick wrote:
Can't believe you need to ask. Where've you been the last few weeks?

OldCarliol wrote:
Why are you surprised at me?

markredfox73 wrote:
If they're hiding away then who's sorting the ground out?

Are you honestly trying to suggest that Jenkins Nixon and Pattison are down at BP every day putting it all back together?

If so, you're wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

spaffhead wrote:
Didn't you get flooded? If so, I thought you might understand all the sh*t and upheaval that comes with it. If not, I apologise.

cocaineblues wrote:
Sorry pal, you are so f*cking wrong. I know for an absolute fact that at least one of them is at BP most of the day, every day. Don't know where you're info is coming fro but it's garbage.

So what you're saying is, you ARE wrong, as Jenkins Nixon and Pattison aren't down at BP every day putting it all back together, yes?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OldCarliol wrote:
What on earth are you on about?

I think hes suggesting you got flooded. Either that or Nixon Jenkins and Patty spend most of their time drinking coffee in your house.

Dancingbear wrote:
I honestly don't know which of them two scenarios would be worse

spaffhead wrote:
Well if you were trusting those three to fill the kettle themselves then its quite possible both scenarios could happen at the same time.

spaffhead wrote:
Obvious mistake, sorry.

cocaineblues wrote:
How on earth am I supposed to understand someone who can't even communicate in basic English.

OldCarliol wrote:
Well fancy that! Your business has been flooded out and some people deserve a medal for trying to sort the mess out! FFS indeed! Why can't the three owners see they have been a failure for years and if it wasn't for AJ filling the gaps which has now become a blocker from new investment. If AJ was doing it for "the love of the club" he would write off most of the debt owed as a loving owner and let the new local business backed by CUOSC take over! Oh wait on JN is the puppet pulling his strings for his own good. Believe it or not I think SP is the best one of them three!

I was going to suggest that the team staying down south for a few days counts as warm weather training but looking at the ice on my car outside I'm not too sure about that. It will be bloody freezing this afternoon in Canons Park.

I know Old Carliol hasn't been backed by other boarders with his comments but I do think he has a point. Much as I dislike AJ on a personal level, I think the WHOLE club has conducted itself with professionalism and quiet efficiency during a very difficult few weeks. Everyone has played their part without exception and I am grateful for what they have done for the club which I support.

OldCarliol wrote: OldCarliol wrote:

Please don't try and pull me up on my grammar, when you don't know the difference between 'your' and 'you're'.

Which part of my post are you struggling to understand? Or is it the simple fact that you're (not your) wrong, that you can't get your head around?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

cocaineblues wrote: Pure spat my tea everywhere when he pulled you up on your English!

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk