TOPIC: Little Accrington against Big Carlisle

accringtonstanley.co.uk/2016/02/video-coley-carlisle-defeat/

CumbrianView wrote: He is a horrible piece of work... "Carlisle capitalised on the luck they got" ... "They scored the two shots they had".... "Flailing arms" ... "Players should be protected" ... "Little Accringtong at big Carlisle" ... Blah blah.

I thought on the day they were a niggly, whinging bunch... The number of fouls by them was ridiculous... The ref let them get away with murder and he is talking about player protection. They did nothing but whinge and moan to the ref all day. They really are a reflection of their manager. I hope we batter them down at their place as well.

Northumbrian wrote:
I agree they were a dirty side I thought. Big game a week a Tuesday. Bit of grudge match.

Ha Ha, He mentions flailing arms from our side but fails to comment on their keeper wiping Michael Raynes out! For me, that was a penalty to us!

Edit to add, Scouse git!

i suggest you listen to the bloke again I lost count of the times he praised Carlisle how we were up for it more than them,how we worked the second goal ect..

yea hes upset about a couple of decisions but so have I been in the past he even praised us for capitalising on them

as for his comments about about us playing home games away...well if Plymouth sneak into a promotion or playoff spot by a point or two possibly because we didn't have home advantage and got beat he may have a point eh...


apart from all that yea a right face on him didn't he....

That bald fella in the tracksuit berated the fourth officially incessantly even after the final whistle. Should be reported to FA

Zebby, I agree he "said" we were the better side but the whole undertone and snideyness of his interview "said" something very different in my opinion. No comment about the ref or how poor and inconsistent he was either which definitely had an effect on the game also. We may' or may not have had only two chances but, we scored from them and that is what wins games Came across as a bitter horrible laal git! I'm sure his family love him though!

I'm with Zebby on this one. I don't think any manager on his own website is going to give the winning opposition team any more praise than he gave.. His job s surely to big up his own team not praise ours. He dealt with the nosebleed incident better than many managers would have, I thought it was a reasonable interview.

Northumbrian wrote:
Obviously it would be lovely to batter them, but a 1-0 Carlisle win with a dodgy 95th minute penalty will do
Or a Scarborough '88 style Steve Richards effort.....whatever annoys him the most really!

Bumble wrote:
Remember our managers comments after last time we played them.Did a real job of big upping our players that day.

To be fair I don't think Accrington could be accused of lacking bottle yesterday, but I did think the better team won. Not something Coleman will want to dwell on when we play them again in less than two weeks. I would think everything said by both managers would have been "weighed and measured" carefully with the return match in mind.

Zebby wrote: I don't need to listen to it again Zebby... I'm quite capable of understanding him first time around thanks. He does say credit toCarlisle several times but then makes lots of snidey little digs... As pointed out by someone else it is the tone of the interview which shows despite what he is saying he is actually giving us no credit whatsoever... Basically saying we were lucky, dirty and long ball... Even whinging about us celebrating a good win.

Northumbrian wrote:
What a load of rubbish, I find it hard to disagree with anything he said there. We did only really have 2 shots on goal first half and scored from both and there wasn't really much in the game. He praised Carlisle quite a few times there, lost count of the amount of times he said "credit to them" and he admitted the better team won.

I thought the referee was terrible with the majority of bad decisions going in Carlisle's favour. I didn't think it was a foul for the free kick which led to our first goal, the booking for the lad first half when Hope simply ran into him was laughable and it was a definite penalty for the foul after Gillespie spilled the shot second half. They went our way and we'll take that all day long but don't expect the opposition manager not to question them.

One final thought. It really shows the mentality of some folk when they boo a lad for cheating who's coming off the pitch with a bust nose! It wasn't a foul, just an unfortunate clash but the lad certainly wasn't feigning injury with blood pouring out his nose!

franksidebottom wrote: You didn't see Hope's shot getting blocked on the line second half then?

We will have to agree to disagree on this one... To me we were comfortably the better team and totally in control of the game. The goals were well worked... nothing to do with luck. Sometimes it's the way it's said and the tone rather than the wording... And how anybody can watch that refereeing display and think he favoured us is beyond me. But it's good to have different opinions on here I guess.

franksidebottom wrote: We will have to agree to disagree on this one... To me we were comfortably the better team and totally in control of the game. The goals were well worked... nothing to do with luck. Sometimes it's the way it's said and the tone rather than the wording... And how anybody can watch that refereeing display and think he favoured us is beyond me. But it's good to have different opinions on here I guess.

Northumbrian wrote:
TBF he did say 2 shots first half

Wasn't a penalty. McQueen was stronger than the forward who went over far too easily.

Dancingbear wrote: So he did... Edited lol

Northumbrian wrote:

Yea you seem quite capable of only picking out the bits you want to hear too...

the bloke even admitted he wasn't a good loser

Piss off with your long quote replys !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Zebby wrote: hopefully one day I will be as skilled as you at interpreting an interview...

Northumbrian wrote:
It's not often you get 2 tackles falling right to a forwards feet 6 yards out to score in a game of football. The build up to both goals was decent by Carlisle but the means of the ball arriving at the scorers feet were both pretty lucky I'd say, either tackle could have gone anywhere!

I've given 3 pretty important decisions the ref gave in Carlisle's favour which perhaps shouldn't have been but can't think of any which went in Accrington's favour, hence why I thought he favoured us. Put it this way, if the roles were reversed I'd expect Curle to mention them in his post match interview.

Why should a opposition manager give us credit anyway? On one thread (player ratings) youve got a lot of our fans saying we were shit and just coz the opposition manager hasnt said he may as well have been playing Brasil hes a tosser.

Didnt get to the match yesterday due to traffic down south but reading this thread I had to check to make sure we actually won. Does it matter that 2 tackles fell to the forwards in the 6 yard box the ball still has to be put in the back of the net. Whether or not Accrington are a form side they are above is in the league so in my view it was an excellent result. Why are there so many miserable sods about who claim to be supporters?

You've obviously misunderstood what we're talking about.

I was in the B Stand and Coleman got plenty of deserved stick during the game but I couldn't fault his interview. what a lot of you are forgetting is that he is Accringtons manager when all's said and done so for christ's sake he really shouldn't be expected to big us up. He gave a very good, professional interview for the manager of a defeated team. Fair play to him. For the record I have an immense amount of sympathy for Accrington. They get shit crowds due to their fanbase going elsewhere to support other towns' teams. It really must be shit for them.

Frank no I didn't!

Well you'll understand that in the context of the game it doesn't matter in the slightest that 2 tackles fell to our forwards to score.

But in the context of what we're talking about, why Coleman said we capitalised on our lucky breaks, then it is relevant.