Tommy Robinson In Town

Alan wrote: Personally i think Corbyn is a bigger threat to our country how can a man who is no more than an anti Semetic Britian hating extremist be allowed to get within a sniff of being PM by simply buying votes.

Why is he anti Semitic? Since 2010 hundreds of thousands of Muslims have died across the middle east as a result of wars the British military are actively involved in. If we are angry about religious persecution why are a couple of comments that snowflakes can't take considered so bad but the systematic murder of women and children by the Tories is accepted?

Where did he say he hates Britain? If the billionaire Viscount Rothermere who prints this shite, or David Cameron or Osborne or May's husband actually had any affection for our country perhaps they wouldn't stash their cash abroad. Corbyn at least pays his tax here rather than the Tories who shout about social security scroungers but don't pay a penny in tax on their earnings.

Buying votes? So not buying bombs that don't work but increasing pensions for people who actually fought for our country and who have worked all their lives is buying votes? Really? Taking away bus passes and free TV licences is good because its not buying votes. So 6 of the largest UK companies now don't pay any tax ? That's good is it? And giving that money to help the old, the mentally ill and the sick is buying votes?

Patricia May's husband works for a company that hasn't paid a penny in tax in 8 years but the directors have been paid £43m. It has £1.1trillion offshore. Yeah, Corbyn hates Britain

Oh dear.

A real pity the large police presence couldn't have been delegated to preventing scores of gypos
Who are now encamped on several areas of town pre Appleby horse fair.
No doubt the cleaning bill for this will be far more expensive than someone trying to get vehicle near town Hall to promote election campaign.

This country is well and truly [censored]

They are not going to touch that one as it contains the word 'ethnic'.

Kicks off in violence every year at Appleby - the Evening News and Star don't like to report much on it yet them and the police jump on a violence free Political announcement like there was a killer on the loose.

Fair enough if that is the Gypsies way of life but does that not extend to a Politicians too - do they have less rights?

munchymagic wrote: They are not going to touch that one as it contains the word 'ethnic'.

Kicks off in violence every year at Appleby - the Evening News and Star don't like to report much on it yet them and the police jump on a violence free Political announcement like there was a killer on the loose.

Fair enough if that is the Gypsies way of life but does that not extend to a Politicians too - do they have less rights?

It was only violence free because the police were there in such numbers. There is a history of things kicking off when Robinson is campaigning (like when that lad assaulted him with a milkshake and when Tommy immediately assaulted him afterwards). Because of that, it makes sense to have more numbers there because it's not a routine political thing, it's something where things are known to sometimes get violent.

Kessler wrote: it's something where things are known to sometimes get violent.

very much like Appleby horse fair then! Oh...and thens the animalwelfare issues! But anyone dare say anything derogatory towards or try and control the Gypsies and they suddenly become some sort of protected species.

Had the misfortune of walking through Rickerby Park yesterday where the shite in the buckets have decided to plot up, what an absolute eyesore, get the tramps chessed ffs.

16 Caravans there today.

melbourneblues wrote: Had the misfortune of walking through Rickerby Park yesterday where the shite in the buckets have decided to plot up, what an absolute eyesore, get the trumps chessed ffs.

They are on Kingmoor ind estate too not a copper in sight apparently the council didn't want Robinson in Carlisle hence the heavy police turnout but turn a blind eye to this shitfest every year .

On 16 November, an article in the British Medical Journal Open concluded that severe public spending cuts by the Conservative Government in the UK were associated with 120,000 deaths between 2010 and 2017. It is believed that 1 of these was Jewish so Jeremy Corbyn is an anti Semite. Another death was close to an Albanian so immigrants are to blame. The Government that has overseen economic growth and has granted massive tax loopholes to Rupert Murdoch, Facebook, Google, Shell and other large donors to the Conservative Party are in no way guilty of the remaining 119.998 deaths.

The shortfall in NHS staff since 2010, 8%, is due to immigrants and social security scroungers. The UK GDP is estimated to be 2.6trillion pounds pa. Of this 10% is lost to tax dodging offshore trusts such as the ones operated by May, Cameron and Osborne. But Ali who lives down your street is the problem. The unmarried mother getting 80 quid a week is the reason we don't have money for the NHS and schools.

Farage is the paid face of outrage. 1 death on Jeremy Kyle, outrage. 2 deaths on love island nothing, 120000 deaths in hospitals lets vote for Farage

Systematic murder of women and children by the tories? If your a labour cult member what did you make of tony Blair killing thousands including our own troops in a war based on lies? Are you a EU / Verhofstadt fan boy Aswell?
You sound ridiculous trying to pretend Corbyn isn’t an anti Semite every sane person in this country knows he is a threat to this country.
Also mentioning people who died for this country and the current Labour Party is an insult considering king Jeremy would rather side with IRA terrorists.
How anyone can defend those idiots such as Corbyn, McDonnell, Abbott is beyond belief.
Then there’s naz shah who told victims of sexual exploitation at the hands of the Muslim community to “ shut their mouths for the sake of diversity “,
And mr Keith vaz- suspended for class A drugs and rent boys who’s still a member of the party on full pay? The Labour Party and all its little pathetic followers are an absolute disgrace to this country

Do you think labour inviting every Asian possible into the country and then paying each of their 5 unemployed wives who are treated worse than a dog with rabies is going to help fund the NHS?

I wouldn't vote Labour again if you paid me.

Traitors - and to think that they used to speak for the average Joe and turned into a trouble making shambles.

Folk can moan Farage going back on his NHS pledge but Corbyn and Labour actually admitted telling lies to the students.

Weirdly enough Corbyn slightly resembles Obi-Wan Kenobi these days so lets hope that Farage or Robinson do a Darth Vader on him and finish the [censored] off.

Diane Abbott will probably still see him in ghost form no doubt afterwards advising her to 'use the force' which will be difficult for someone who cannot even use a calculator.

Found guilty and looks like he'll be gan back in the chokey. Won't be so cocky when he's back in there I'll bet.

He's moaning about our laws now. Well if he duzzent lyk ower country's laws he's free to get on a plaen to a country's he duz inne?*



*Well actually no, he'd be a fugitive evading justice but it's the thought that counts

Politics has gone to the dogs and everything sterile in society.

Everyone remembers that 'trick' where you can make a needle suspend in the air on your finger without glue or tape but by slightly putting it through the skin.

My mates kid tried something similar recently and was pulled into school as now this old trick is considered as 'self harm'.

I know that they have to keep an eye on the kids but common sense should always prevail.

Hopefully Tommy will weigh in on this asylum seeking scumbag and their flimsy pretences

news.sky.com/story/tommy-robinson-begs-t...th-sentence-11759351

orfc wrote: Hopefully Tommy will weigh in on this asylum seeking scumbag and their flimsy pretences

news.sky.com/story/tommy-robinson-begs-t...th-sentence-11759351

Yaxley-Lennon sounds unhinged if those quotes are accurate.

English prison cells for English criminals

Why can't these people just follow british laws like the rest of us?

I just happened to be walking up Ludgate Hill this lunchtime by the Old Bailey as the Tommy Robinson supporters were gathering outside. It was quite well organised and a nice sunny day out for them. Police were there in riot gear and a police helicopter circled above but it was all fairly tame stuff.

We're all entitled to our opinion but i'm struggling arguing with those that think he is some sort of national hero.

He is a thug and nasty piece of work. There was a media ban on the case, he has gone to prison for, to protect the victims and the other trials. What he did was stupidity of the highest order, he could of collapsed the trials and freed the paedophiles.

What he has to do with brexit, who knows! thank god we won't be hearing from him for a while.

The guy is a total and utter bell-end who deserves nothing less than a stint inside. Can't stand the guy or his ideas. Not for me thanks.

Sent from my LG-H840 using Tapatalk

Totally agree. He is as useless as a chocolate teapot. He gives nothing to society. He's an utter baw bag who should spend his time in the nick carefully and think his life over a bit. Because he really needs to! Utter [censored] of a human.

Sent from my LG-H840 using Tapatalk

EI255 wrote: Totally agree. He is as useless as a chocolate teapot. He gives nothing to society. He's an utter baw bag who should spend his time in the nick carefully and think his life over a bit. Because he really needs to! Utter [censored] of a human.

Sent from my LG-H840 using Tapatalk

The people he criticises are far worse than he will ever be, why would anyone defend a gang of nonces?

munchymagic wrote: why would anyone defend a gang of nonces?

I don't think anyone is actually doing that though. Everyone deserves a fair trial and Tommy's actions put that in jeopardy. It might seem frustrating, but rules like this are in place for a reason. Prejudicial reporting before or during a trial is something that the defense can later use to appeal, claiming they didn't receive a fair trial because of it.

Also, it doesn't matter if the people he was criticizing are "worse" than him. That doesn't allow him to break the law himself.

Kessler wrote:

munchymagic wrote: why would anyone defend a gang of nonces?

I don't think anyone is actually doing that though. Everyone deserves a fair trial and Tommy's actions put that in jeopardy. It might seem frustrating, but rules like this are in place for a reason. Prejudicial reporting before or during a trial is something that the defense can later use to appeal, claiming they didn't receive a fair trial because of it.

Also, it doesn't matter if the people he was criticizing are "worse" than him. That doesn't allow him to break the law himself.

I get your point but I would rather shake his hand than a nonce's.

munchymagic wrote:

Kessler wrote:

munchymagic wrote: why would anyone defend a gang of nonces?

I don't think anyone is actually doing that though. Everyone deserves a fair trial and Tommy's actions put that in jeopardy. It might seem frustrating, but rules like this are in place for a reason. Prejudicial reporting before or during a trial is something that the defense can later use to appeal, claiming they didn't receive a fair trial because of it.

Also, it doesn't matter if the people he was criticizing are "worse" than him. That doesn't allow him to break the law himself.

I get your point but I would rather shake his hand than a nonce's.

And is anybody actually disagreeing with you about that? Has anyone told you you should shake a nonce's hand?

Kessler wrote:

munchymagic wrote:

Kessler wrote:

munchymagic wrote: why would anyone defend a gang of nonces?

I don't think anyone is actually doing that though. Everyone deserves a fair trial and Tommy's actions put that in jeopardy. It might seem frustrating, but rules like this are in place for a reason. Prejudicial reporting before or during a trial is something that the defense can later use to appeal, claiming they didn't receive a fair trial because of it.

Also, it doesn't matter if the people he was criticizing are "worse" than him. That doesn't allow him to break the law himself.

I get your point but I would rather shake his hand than a nonce's.

And is anybody actually disagreeing with you about that? Has anyone told you you should shake a nonce's hand?

Stupid question Kessler that you know the answer to.

He went about it the wrong way but TR's intentions are better than the grooming scum he is fighting against.

Just vote for Corbyn like you were always going to do anyhow and maybe complain about his corrupt 'emailing system' to give yourself something new to get your teeth into whilst boring the rest of us to tears with the ins and outs of the complexities of the IT situation.

Tommy Robinson - better than a nonce. He should have that on his grave stone!

nobbyblue wrote: Tommy Robinson - better than a nonce. He should have that on his grave stone!

Nah ' A Better Choice Than Corbyn' is better....

Must every single one of your posts include a strawman munchy? Nobody is defending grooming gangs or saying they are better than TR, yet you are arguing as though that's the case. Why is him being "better" than someone else relevant to any of this? He broke the law, after being repeatedly warned he was breaking the law, so what part about his conviction do you find objectionable? You really do spout some rubbish at times.

munchymagic wrote: He went about it the wrong way but TR's intentions are better than the grooming scum he is fighting against.

I could accept that his intentions may have been good, but his actions really weren't helpful. If anything, he actually made it more difficult to convict grooming gangs. Prejudicial reporting during a trial is something that the defense will later use to appeal any conviction, arguing that their client didn't receive a fair trial because of biased reporting. How would you feel if a nonce walked free specifically because they were able to argue that TR's reporting prevented them getting a fair trial?

munchymagic wrote: Just vote for Corbyn like you were always going to do anyhow and maybe complain about his corrupt 'emailing system' to give yourself something new to get your teeth into whilst boring the rest of us to tears with the ins and outs of the complexities of the IT situation.

Not on topic, post in the appropriate thread if you want to debate that.

munchymagic wrote:

Kessler wrote:

munchymagic wrote: why would anyone defend a gang of nonces?

I don't think anyone is actually doing that though. Everyone deserves a fair trial and Tommy's actions put that in jeopardy. It might seem frustrating, but rules like this are in place for a reason. Prejudicial reporting before or during a trial is something that the defense can later use to appeal, claiming they didn't receive a fair trial because of it.

Also, it doesn't matter if the people he was criticizing are "worse" than him. That doesn't allow him to break the law himself.

I get your point but I would rather shake his hand than a nonce's.

Hasn't the EDL been shown to have a fair few nonces in its ranks?

politicsandinsights.org/2018/05/29/the-e...doesnt-condemn-them/

Anyways if you shake their hands you're stopping them touching kids aren't you?

It's the sort of thing I could maybe understand why he did it initially, thinking he was "getting justice". But once they explained that his actions actually made that more difficult, I don't understand why he would continue. Either he is just that stupid, or he knew exactly what he was doing and just wanted to play the martyr.

Kessler wrote: It's the sort of thing I could maybe understand why he did it initially, thinking he was "getting justice". But once they explained that his actions actually made that more difficult, I don't understand why he would continue. Either he is just that stupid, or he knew exactly what he was doing and just wanted to play the martyr.

I will answer your earlier unedited comment Kessler - there was no argument to lose, I got my point across and just didn't want to debate on it any further.