- Posts: 2136
- Likes received: 729
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
thetashkentterror wrote:
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Inevitably more people will complain after a defeat, so that's no surprise.
However, the same problems are there even after a win.
Look at the Oldham game, yes we won, but the game itself was appalling in terms of entertainment and quality, you've got someone saying the service was crap in the East Stand, the beer was awful in the Sunset Suite and you had the lovely new decor in the Sporting Inn.
The same kind of problems, quality of the game excepted, that have been going on for years and years and years and people are expected not to be negative about it.
I'd also point out on negativity, that some people are glass half full and some are glass half empty, that's the way life is.
Glass half fullers need to realise at times that some glass half emptiers have issues with mental health, at even the most minor level that lead to a negative outlook on life, so why would that negative outlook not extend to their view on CUFC?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote:
thetashkentterror wrote:
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Inevitably more people will complain after a defeat, so that's no surprise.
However, the same problems are there even after a win.
Look at the Oldham game, yes we won, but the game itself was appalling in terms of entertainment and quality, you've got someone saying the service was crap in the East Stand, the beer was awful in the Sunset Suite and you had the lovely new decor in the Sporting Inn.
The same kind of problems, quality of the game excepted, that have been going on for years and years and years and people are expected not to be negative about it.
I'd also point out on negativity, that some people are glass half full and some are glass half empty, that's the way life is.
Glass half fullers need to realise at times that some glass half emptiers have issues with mental health, at even the most minor level that lead to a negative outlook on life, so why would that negative outlook not extend to their view on CUFC?
I can be as negative as the next fan and gobby with it, but no one wants to come to a message board and read negative moaning, with no constructive criticism, week after week, it just becomes repetative and boring. I like the match threads, particularly after the match. I want different opinions, things mentioned I didn't see, things I did see but a different take on it. Even if those posts are negative , I still like to read them. Its the constant "that was crap, we were crap" posts that get me down, the ones that I get the feeling some folk have stored on wordpad, to cut and paste into any match thread, any topic.
Can we have two match threads in future please, one for talk on the actual match concerned and the match day experience at the match. Negative or positive but specifc to that match, saying what went wrong and right. Then another one, labelled "that was crap" just for the generic, one size fits all posts!
Don't get your point with glass half fullers at all. Not all negative thinkers suffer from mental health issues, not all positive thinkers are free of mental health issues. I am not going to assume that because some one is negative they have mental health issues, I feel that would do them and the illness an injustice.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Waltero wrote: The way we're playing Richard we won't get through the 1st round
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
nobbyblue wrote: You're sounding a bit negative these days DB. There's no room for that on here.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
paddockite wrote:
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Absolutely bang on.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
lummy8 wrote: Where is NCF?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
seesaw50 wrote:
lummy8 wrote: Where is NCF?
Been thinking this as well...........Obviously bored of the same old rubbish, if you dont criticise you risk the wrath of the main critics...some of who, dare I say it, haven't been to a game for some time.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Mullen103 wrote: Simply put: supporters are losing interest because it’s crap.
If you’re not happy about the standard of posts on the match thread, or any others, post something to change the direction of it.
Just like those that complain about their question not being asked, ask it?
I know a lot of supporters from other teams and our match day threads and complaints are very mild in comparison, hence the Oldham comments. I think that’s a Carlisle/Cumbrian mentality though.
There’s no excitement at the club, it just seems to be “getting by� and going through the motions. The leagues finished already so the only thing left is a big draw in the 3rd round of the FA cup.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote:
thetashkentterror wrote:
Bumble wrote: I think the never ending negativity on here contibutes to the lack of posters. It becomes an effort to come and read the match threads when you know it will be the same comments by the same posters.
I thought there would be a bit of reaction in the match thread today.
Us starting without either Thomas or McKirdy, should Loft have come on sooner?
Did Bridge coming back make a difference?
Were the tactics right?
Were the Newport players justified in running back to goad the Carlisle fans and did the stewards act correctly?
These are the sort of things I want to read in the match thread.
Everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they don't go to games, but when it's the same old, same old opinion, week after week after week, for me it gets boring and difficult to read, so it makes it harder to make the effort to post.
Inevitably more people will complain after a defeat, so that's no surprise.
However, the same problems are there even after a win.
Look at the Oldham game, yes we won, but the game itself was appalling in terms of entertainment and quality, you've got someone saying the service was crap in the East Stand, the beer was awful in the Sunset Suite and you had the lovely new decor in the Sporting Inn.
The same kind of problems, quality of the game excepted, that have been going on for years and years and years and people are expected not to be negative about it.
I'd also point out on negativity, that some people are glass half full and some are glass half empty, that's the way life is.
Glass half fullers need to realise at times that some glass half emptiers have issues with mental health, at even the most minor level that lead to a negative outlook on life, so why would that negative outlook not extend to their view on CUFC?
I can be as negative as the next fan and gobby with it, but no one wants to come to a message board and read negative moaning, with no constructive criticism, week after week, it just becomes repetative and boring. I like the match threads, particularly after the match. I want different opinions, things mentioned I didn't see, things I did see but a different take on it. Even if those posts are negative , I still like to read them. Its the constant "that was crap, we were crap" posts that get me down, the ones that I get the feeling some folk have stored on wordpad, to cut and paste into any match thread, any topic.
Can we have two match threads in future please, one for talk on the actual match concerned and the match day experience at the match. Negative or positive but specifc to that match, saying what went wrong and right. Then another one, labelled "that was crap" just for the generic, one size fits all posts!
Don't get your point with glass half fullers at all. Not all negative thinkers suffer from mental health issues, not all positive thinkers are free of mental health issues. I am not going to assume that because some one is negative they have mental health issues, I feel that would do them and the illness an injustice.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
munchymagic wrote: When things are crap then pretending that your glass is half full or full is stupidity, this is called kidding yourself.
If we had gotten a draw on Saturday then you could call this glass half full but we got beat so it is empty.
And I would call it stupidity for anyone reading the match thread after a defeat looking for everyone to be upbeat whilst we languish in eighteenth.
It is like buying a newspaper and being disgusted at the real life events taking place as you were expecting it to be full of stories about firemen rescuing cute furry kittens from trees and families re-united after decades apart.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote: I can be as negative as the next fan and gobby with it, but no one wants to come to a message board and read negative moaning, with no constructive criticism, week after week, it just becomes repetative and boring.
Bumble wrote: I like the match threads, particularly after the match. I want different opinions, things mentioned I didn't see, things I did see but a different take on it. Even if those posts are negative , I still like to read them. Its the constant "that was crap, we were crap" posts that get me down, the ones that I get the feeling some folk have stored on wordpad, to cut and paste into any match thread, any topic.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Kessler wrote:
Bumble wrote: I can be as negative as the next fan and gobby with it, but no one wants to come to a message board and read negative moaning, with no constructive criticism, week after week, it just becomes repetative and boring.
But what is there to be positive about though? The club is slowly dying, the directors are completely out of touch and have deluded themselves into thinking it's just a few fans who are unhappy with them rather than looking at the thousands who have walked away in the last decade and thought about why that might be. Even when you get the occasional good result, it's hard to see it as a positive because the overall direction of the club these days means we'll probably be in non league within a few years unless something changes.
Bumble wrote: I like the match threads, particularly after the match. I want different opinions, things mentioned I didn't see, things I did see but a different take on it. Even if those posts are negative , I still like to read them. Its the constant "that was crap, we were crap" posts that get me down, the ones that I get the feeling some folk have stored on wordpad, to cut and paste into any match thread, any topic.
But things are crap. Why is it wrong to point that out? If the club want less negativity, then give us stuff we can be positive about.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
seesaw50 wrote: The other side of the coin, maybe, if you have a negative outlook on everything you may bring mental health problems on yourself. Just a thought
Am guessing Man U and Man City fans are a bit depressed tonight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bumble wrote: I, like most folk know many fans, friends and family, who have stopped going in recent years, some relative newbies who got caught up in the Knighton/Courtenay/Story rollercoaster, some who had been through the dreariness of pre Knighton but can't face it again.
I am not saying that there isn't a lot to be negative about. I'm certainly not saying folk shouldn't be negaqtive, that's up to each to decide. But for me personally, it puts me off posting, particularly on a match thread.
It's not the negativity per se, when we play badly it's justified but if all the post says is "we're crap, DH is crap, the owners are crap" I don't learn anything new. I don't get any insights into players. I don't find out things I missed. The "we're crap" stuff I've heard a hundred times before, so I can't be bothered to read the thread or post on it.
So I'm not criticising folk for being negative, or that it's wrong to post negative posts. I wouldn't say that, everyone's opinion is valid.
I am saying that personally I find the threads that just say we're crap and nothing new boring, particularly in a match thread when I hope for current comment. When there is little current and new over a few games it means I stop reading them, maybe thats just me?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
