Simples.
Every time before we locked down cases and deaths were shooting up. When we locked down, shortly after cases began to fall as transmission was restricted, then hospitalisations, then deaths. Using your logic the lockdowns travelled backwards in time and caused the rise in cases.
What a crock. The number of deaths in August with no lockdowns in Scotland was 1 a day. It remained at that level for 7 weeks after the schools opened Just mince. Japan had no lockdowns, 125m people, fewer deaths than Scotland. Korea the same. Belarus the same. New Zealand, Vietnam, Botswana, very short lockdowns, less deaths than Britain.
Johnson, Sturgeon, Starmer, have supported lockdown which has caused the worst recession in 300 years, the most excess deaths since 1945. You support that, show me the evidence why.
There have been 3 major court cases where the equivalent of high court judges have considered the evidence for lockdown. In every case the Government has lost. In Portugal, it was considered that testing was not accurate enough to force to people to be imprisoned in their hotels. In Belgium the evidence was not enough to warrant lockdown. In California the court told the state to release the scientific evidence for lockdown, the state lifted lockdown rather than release evidence.
There is no scientific evidence that proves that lockdown is better than non lockdown, as you know. The Government is buying press space because it has been challenged in the high court, in England, by the hospitality industry. Johnson opened his great mouth and said we can't open the pubs because of scientific evidence. Immediately the hospitality industry jumped on him and opened a case to show the scientific evidence. And like you, who has searched for it, it doesn't exist. Hopefully the pubs, clubs football teams et al will sue the arse off Johnson, Sturgeon and the rest of them for compensation.