Doesn't everybody see what is happening? We tried the big spending approach with Curle which brought us a top 10 position, an annual loss of £700k, no young players of our own being developed, dull football and falling attendances. Clibbens with the tacit support of EWM has said we need to have a different approach.
They have looked at the figures and seen if they take £750k out the playing budget and play attractive football the Club might expect to finish say 10th to 14th but importantly break even. With a good manager we could do much better as Accrington have proved. Add in the prospect of future football fortune from selling on players like we used to do and suddenly the Club looks a much more attractive proposition for new owners/investment.
People are wrong to say EWM are simply keeping the Board in place. They are actually working with Clibbens to bring about change.
But if you look at those figures put on the Forum yesterday Carlisle spend an average amount on players wages - 11th, I think. Not sure as to the voracity of those figures but it doesn't seem a million miles off.
I know lots of people don't like Curle but he didn't have a top budget and if the past few seasons have represented a big spending approach then God help the club in its new austerity role. Big spenders are Notts County, Luton, Mansfield, Coventry, Chesterfield, Swindon, Exeter and so on.
Accrington are the only successful team I can see in the bottom 2 divisions doing it on a shoestring. If it was easy and the norm all the clubs would have a weekly wage bill of 15k. It isn't and stories like Accrington attract such interest because they are so unusual. It's not to say that Carlisle can't do that but to spend 3 years putting money into a squad and then dismantling it seems knee jerk.
Wiping out an annual loss of 700k in 1 year is hugely risky if it means slashing the playing staff. I appreciate that racking up debts isn't sustainable in the long term but this feels like a fire sale but with no sales coming in.
It can't go on losing 700k and something needs to change but this has the feel of crushing a butterfly on a wheel.
Sales of players from L2 clubs in the past year over 250K - Wyke's fee, I think, total 9 players. 1 was Ched Evans. 2 were from Exeter, 2 from Luton, 1 from Forest Green, 1 from Coventry, 1 from Lincoln and 1, you've guessed it, 1 from Accrington.
All of these cubs are big spenders apart from Accy.
It's a fantastic model to try and copy and there's nothing wrong in aspiring to it but if you look at stats, successful teams, player sales etc etc it all points to investment unless you happen to have this unique Accy story.
The current slash and burn approach is my eyes just backs the club into a corner. It's like, well tried this, it didn't work so let's do the complete opposite.
If I was Clibbens I spend a week in Exeter and a week in Luton. Speak to everybody from the bottom to the top of the club. And then go to Accy and spend a week there.
It's such a risky strategy just getting rid of the higher earners and hoping that you unearth a new manager who's going to find hidden jewels.
You're right that player sales, as Luton and Exeter have done, generate football fortune but where's the room for it in this model? Player development isn't free.
And in the meantime the club, hopefully won't go down.
I's very risky. It does look good for investment or a takeover but only if it's in L2.
It just all feels so very rushed and draconian at the moment. I hope I'm wrong but it's asking an awful lot to get a new man in who can keep the club going forwards and keeping fans coming in with a lower playing budget.
If breaking even and finishing 14th means new investment then it's been a job well done by Clibbens. We got 10th last year with Clint in the side.
But, boy, it's a hell of a gamble.