TOPIC: Jenkins program notes

His program notes are normally full of codswallop and baffling statements.

Apparently though he is going to address a few issues on Saturday and explain the Stevenage outburst. Will wait what nonsense is published this time.

It'll be a load of codswallop used to sell programs I bet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of course he'll do it that way. Nobody can ask any questions of him, and he gets to put across exactly what he wants to say, no fuss, no interruptions and absolutely no chance of contradiction. If he wants to offer his side, it should be on BBCRC, live with Lummy and Phillips able to question him.

No chance of that moorlad, the [censored] coward!

They're all cowards.

Moorlad wrote:
Very true, but he's done plenty of statements via the official site, that again, don't allow someone to dissect and interrogate in real time.

Mullen103 wrote:
Stepping down and banishing SP & JN? If only!

Programme, not program.

PADDOCK wrote:
I was on about border crack and deekabout

Its a clever move as he can attack the News and Star who wont be able to reply til Monday.

Unless he is turning into ken bates and will use his programme notes to launch tirades at his enemies.

That's the thing they will just realease statements rather than have a debate/discussion which stinks and loses respect and honestly in my eyes.

Nixon on radio wouldn't take any public questions, it all stinks.

I don't buy programmes so I will wait until Colman tweets on Saturday what's in it. No doubt will be critical of all those non conformers.

Just a cunning plan to sell a few more programmes. They are always thinking ahead! Marketing gurus .

For TV it's still programme, Mullen.

1954Blue wrote:
It isn't

Example:

This computer program is not responding.
When referring to television or training, we would use the noun ‘programme’.

Examples:

This TV programme is really great. We must watch it next week.
The programme of events was interesting at the sports day.
The training day had several programmes to choose from.

Unless you are an American and then too lazy to learn more than one meaning of a word and use program for everything

Afraid it is, Televisions show programmes. Computers run a program though.


Programme is the 'correct' spelling although it's use over program is fairly recent, becoming the wider used spelling in the 19th century. Influenced by l'frogs.

I stand corrected, although the tv mag I have states TV program. I checked before and I'm not in America.

Nee good at English. No idea how I got a B at GCSE

bruntonpete wrote:
Carlisle United, marketing gurus

Will someone post a photo of the notes on here? I will if I can make the match. That's allowed, right?

RonBacardi wrote:
Pretty sure Jon Colman will give a breakdown on his twitter account today if this isn't possible.

Apologises.

Spoke to a number of loyal supporters before Stevenage game who complained about negative attitiude of local media after yet another N&S; column written against those running the club. They and many other fans can't understand why the media are doing this with club improving both on and off the field. They feel it unjustified as the club moves forward.

Investor exists, his input together with some vital local involvement is best way to secure future of club. Gave his word he will not disclose his identity and will continue not to do that.

Won't discuss Curle's contract in public and definitely not through media. Most reasonable-minded people would not expect their own employment contracts to be discussed in public.

Nowt else of interest.

thetashkentterror wrote:
If AJ actually believes this then I am honestly concerned for his state of mind....

Then suggest that they (and AJand JN possibly google, lets see - free press; Josef Goebels and article 14 of the Nazi newspaper law; the Levellers (group of people not band), First amendment; Pravda and so on......somone might also want to ask AJ's ghostwriter what exactly we were fighting for in WW2, Afghanistan, Iraq etc....

Off to vomit -

"loyal supporters"

Are there any other kind? Or does he mean only the ones who swallow the party line, keep their mouths shut and keep handing over their cash?

thetashkentterror wrote:
Apologises - depends really. If he says something like "I apologise if something offensive was accidentally broadcast", that's a pathetic apology. If he says "Sorry - I was wrong and my behaviour was a disgrace, and I'm ashamed" then fair enough.

The rest is of course utter drivel. The club is improving? Moving forward? Clart. The media give CUFC brilliant coverage. They also ask questions that deserve answers.
As for the contract stuff - why do the club issue press releases stating the length of player contracts then, if it's so wrong?

The bloke is an incompetent, out of touch moron. The sooner he exits the better.

"I would apologise to anyone who was offended"

I like to know these people that are against the media trying to report the truth and get answers because in the stands there's no silent majority thinking Jenkins is doing a good job.

Anyone stupid enough to buy the program should rip the page out and make an aeroplane and throw it on the pitch.

Just edited it for you a bit tashkent

Apologises.

Spoke members of London branch kate Rowleys mob before Stevenage game who complained about negative attitiude of local media after yet another N&S; column written against those running the club. They and many other fans can't understand why the media are doing this with club improving both on and off the field. They feel it unjustified as the club moves forward.

Investor exists in my little fantasy world his input together with some vital local involvement is best way us having to sell brunton park putting us in a 8k capacity sh1t pit Whilst i make a nice tidy profit on the pun i spent buying the place .Gave his word he will not disclose his identity and will continue not to do that.

Won't discuss Curle's contract in public and definitely not through media. Most reasonable-minded people would not expect their own employment contracts to be discussed in public.

So come on then...who was at stevenage last week that comes on here ...and spoke to the stupid old fossil??? Bound to be someone...saw plenty of boarders there....or is this just more bullshit excuses...afterall he had a week for someone to prepare this..

My piss is boiled today. Please can someone in the paddock just tell him today what the majority want? And what he has become?

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

That's out of order Mashie.

Away Pete man, was sang at Mansfield (all be it for Nixon I think). Didn't hear many complaining? They are the cancer of our club.

Mashie Niblick wrote:
I want them out as much as the next man but i have played 5 a side with both his sons and they are decent blokes who will be heartbroken when the time comes.

thetashkentterror wrote:
So that's not an apology then. If you were offended, the onus is on you to tell him you were offended so that he can then apologise?

Pathetic.

Let's leave out the abuse eh, criticism is fine. 'He said it first' means nowt.

Deano..fans are pissed off ...hes laughing in the faces of fans who no longer want him or the rest of the bumbling dinosaurs at the club...the abuse is fully justified and they have themselves to blame..

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

ParcelPete wrote: Not gonna happen anytime soon, Pete. Lie after lie after lie. Taking the piss out of those who still go each week. ****s!

Maybe his sons should have a word in his decrepid ear and let him know that he has rightfully become a figure of hate to most of the supporters. Foul language to any objectors, blocking new investment and making up billionaire stories, the bloke is a Shan.

So Jenkins took out his anger over the Colman N&S; article by calling James Phillips a c***?

He's lost the plot.

Why doesn't he just [censored] off

Come on Paddock / main stand. Tell them what you think of them. Don't let the liars sit there for 90 mins smirking at you all!

10/10 for the programme editor for placement of that red box.

"I would apologise to anyone offended" BUT

Still trying to get out of it again....

The man is a complete disgrace, I cannot believe I just read that waffle blowing out of his arse.

Alan wrote:
I am a member of the London Branch albeit not living in London. Whats your problem with the London Branch? Over the years they have provided valued support to the TEAM. I certainly do not agree with what is going on at the club and believe real progress cannot be achieved with AJ and JN in control but in the 20 years of being a member of the London Branch all I have ever seen is them trying the best for the club and TEAM and certainly many do not agree with the current goings on at the club.

At the same time it would appear that the London Branch are right up Jenkins jeer and he can do no wrong.

Welcome to the real world, in Carlisle we see him as an out of date clown who we would love to see gone.

Just goes to show how out of date the London branch really is, they probably think that Wadsworth is still the manager.

" but in the 20 years of being a member of the London Branch all I have ever seen is them trying the best for the club and TEAM"

Like not selling the club to Lapping and making up all this billionaire stuff?

Nixon doing his best for the team was his arrogant team talks before a game.

Maybe the London Branch could rename itself the'We Love Nixon And Jenkins' fan club.

Crangon_Crangon wrote:
Whilst you are entitled to your opinion as is any one who comes on this forum aiming pathetic insults at me because I am a member of the LB makes me laugh. You have never met me, those that do know I am no supporter of our current owners and that I am and always have been a supporter of our Team and whilst I may be many things out of date aint one of them

More a dig at the Jenkins and Nixon loving organisation that you are a member of.

I also noticed that in Jenkins eyes you are only a true fan of Carlisle United if you worship him and Nixon, if not you are a hostile enemy?!

I think you've got the wrong end of the stick crangon. Looks to me like he's saying the London branch have only done good not the three amigos.

I know you can't tar them all with the same brush DB but over the years as an organisation they have always been pally with Nixon and Jenkins.

Mashie Niblick wrote: surely it's a red card offence swearing is it not classed as foul and abusive language