It shows you how close the first decision was when there is still some doubt. At the time I thought it was a penalty, and in fact still do. It was also a very reckless and deliberate bad tackle, and I think if Grainger had got past him we'd have been likely to score.
The second one is a different matter, no argument at all about whether it was in the box. I couldn't see the line on Saturday from where I was stood, but it didn't even look like a foul. It does now though, and was a definite penalty, so the officials got that one wrong.
Their lad Burgess who brought Grainger down looked a very good footballer.