bluealf wrote:
Well you just wallow in your misery about it then, sensible folk will look at it and think we dominated them for large parts of the game and bar 3 individual errors we would have had a better result.
It isn't about being happy clappy either but being honest with your comments, not just you either btw but some of the stuff written on here in the last 12 hours is ridiculously over the top.
Then we have the folk who are now moaning about us passing it out from the back but they moaned about the "lump ball" last season, there is a reason teams in our division play lump ball and that is evidenced by our defenders passing skills or the decisions of when to pass or smash it long.
to be fair Alf, it is possible to moan about lumping it forward and about pointlessly passing the ball across your back four for the sake of it... Most folk appreciate a passing approach BUT it has to be done with some common sense.... For much of Saturday we didn't play passing football... What we did was play 5 pointless, risky passes across the back four, despite being marked... And then just lumped it forward anyway. Passing for the sake of passing is stupid.... Passing in the wrong areas at the wrong time is stupid.... Passing needs to achieve something and has to have a point to it... We haven't struck the right balance yet. I'm hoping we will soon. It shouldn't be a difficult concept for the players to grasp, provided they are allowed to make their own decisions on the field.