Email address edited out. In future please think before putting other peoples personal emails up - wether they're in the public domain or not. Thanks.
Email address edited out. In future please think before putting other peoples personal emails up - wether they're in the public domain or not. Thanks.
Email address edited out. In future please think before putting other peoples personal emails up - wether they're in the public domain or not. Thanks.
It's an email address that was on the website ffs. He's a rep that should be contactable.
Yes I think I would expect them to put a decent statement out. They've been after investment for years so if they've finally got it then why wouldn't they say? Your being a right fanny lately deckchair
Email address edited out. In future please think before putting other peoples personal emails up - wether they're in the public domain or not. Thanks.
It's an email address that was on the website ffs. He's a rep that should be contactable.
It's common courtesy Mullen.
It's also not listed on the main CUOSC Contact page?
http://www.united-trust.org.uk/contactus.shtml
Yes I think I would expect them to put a decent statement out. They've been after investment for years so if they've finally got it then why wouldn't they say? Your being a right fanny lately deckchair
Is a loan investment ? Though I feel that question was gone through 100 times over during the last 12 months.
Apologies Dancing, not my intention.
Just gets on my nerves that-
A) people seem to think everything, regardless of whether they realistically have any impact on it, is the boards fault
B) people seem to feel entitled to know the ins and outside of every single thing at the club, far more than any fans of other clubs I know do. Forgetting that the club is a business and they wouldn't expect to know the same about any other business.
Coupled with personal and work stress lately, has probably turned me into a irritable old git stuck inside a mid-20s body.
Would you expect the club to release the details of everything they do ?
Did you put a copy of your mortgage agreement out to the public when you signed it ?
Whatever you think about Mr Day, this prevents the others raising money against the ground to repay themselves like Knighton did. Has Mr Day put this money in place to repay PFD as suggested further up? time will tell, but now there is one club asset that the BOD have less control over, Mr Day has a foot well wedged in the door now it would appear.
Almost certainly PFD will be repaid from EWM's loan. PFD filed its accounts to the end of April 2016 in January 2017. Nobody noticed that the loan to CUFC (1921) which then stood at £690,750 had become repayable within 12 months. i.e. by 30th April 2017 at the latest. On that basis the loan from EWM may just be a round £1 million.
I wrote about the accounting treatment of loans under FRS 102 a feweeks ago-I think that's why the loan in Pioneer will have terms attached to it so it isn't written off by the auditors.Marko will confirm if he is still alive.I also wrote about going concern issues-always a problem for football clubs at all levels.
I don't see EWM paying off dead loans but we shall see when the detail is revealed.
I do think this is a positive step for all-and I include the current stakeholders in that statement as the Club clearly needs refinanced properly and aggressively
I've heard he's wanting to turn BP into the north's biggest factory outlet. Jumpers and scarves as far as the eye can see.
That was from a very unreliable source mind.
CCU, I think that explains the delay in signing off the accounts compared to last year when they had been signed on 5th November. It looks to me as if PFD (Pioneer) want to put their business relationship with the club on an arms length basis and have fixed a date before the end of April 2017 for when they get paid back. This has repercussions for the going concern sign-off of the 1921 company accounts by the auditors and forces the club to replace the PFD loan with what now seems to be a new arrangement with EWM. I suppose if no-one else came forward then AJ himself would have had to stump up the cash out of his own pocket.
Once the jocks get independence BP could become a tax haven for woolly jumper outlets. Instead of fag runs we could make a killing getting them down for buckfast and cardies.
We could end up like the sports direct for knitwear. Outlets all over selling 70% off all jumpers and woollen socks.
The first knitted kit. Heaviest strip going and all our fans in 'club wear' on the terraces in v necks and polo sweatshirts.
A knitted roof over the waterworks end and KC sat in the dugout dressed head to toe in an acrylic onesie.
Come on Day! Get your finger out and make it happen.
I used to work at EWM abut 30 years ago in Longtown. That's the only thing I know about it ,hope this helps everyone
We could end up like the sports direct for knitwear. Outlets all over selling 70% off all jumpers and woollen socks.
The first knitted kit. Heaviest strip going and all our fans in 'club wear' on the terraces in v necks and polo sweatshirts.
A knitted roof over the waterworks end and KC sat in the dugout dressed head to toe in an acrylic onesie.
Come on Day! Get your finger out and make it happen.
So instead of a few wins papering over the cracks we'll be able to knit one pearl one over them instead.
Been told by a very reliable source that this isn't investment it's a full takeover.
I assume he knows what he's doing. I don't think you become a billionaire by accident.
Been told by a very reliable source that this isn't investment it's a full takeover.
You mean you read it on James Phillips Twitter
Been told by a very reliable source that this isn't investment it's a full takeover.
I wouldn't begrudge AJ becoming honorary life president if it did become a takeover - the bloke is a fan and has put his cash in over time.
It's what would happen to Nixon, Pattinson and Clibbens that is important - These three have a negative impact in most fans eyes.
Kidd and King would get a chance to prove their worth under new MD/Chief Exec for me - Working under the current regime must be frustrating!
Would also be interested in any potential Trust involvement and/or possible dilution.
I wouldn't begrudge AJ becoming honorary life president if it did become a takeover - the bloke is a fan and has put his cash in over time.
It's what would happen to Nixon, Pattinson and Clibbens that is important - These three have a negative impact in most fans eyes.
Kidd and King would get a chance to prove their worth under new MD/Chief Exec for me - Working under the current regime must be frustrating!
Would also be interested in any potential Trust involvement and/or possible dilution.
Might Clibbens be getting a slightly unfair deal because he's effectively the mouthpiece for AJ, JN and, to a lesser extent SP?
If he had been brought in after a takeover by new owners might he be looked on more favourably? Guilty by association, perhaps?
