TOPIC: Deleted tweet from Andy bell

Waltero wrote:
Christ, do you want the crowds down to by another 500? If every Carlisle fan who has made light of Hillsborough at the expense of Liverpool fans on social media was banned that's where we'd be at.

When you say pay them £5M each, you do know who will be paying this?
Just think the compensation angle takes away the moral high ground.
Agree on the jailings for the guilty cops though.

nobbyblue wrote:
No not in anyway that couldnt of been accurately predicted beforehand therefore it was the polices responsibility to have a plan to negate that behaviour the fact that they didnt or it didnt work is what makes them liable.

Be interested to know what sort of behaviour you think there was that couldnt of been predicted.or that you think caused the disaster ?

No price on those people killed, if suing the Yorkshire Police makes things better for the families and people of Liverpool (even though they are a bunch of militants) then good, why not. the higher the price, the more action is taken to ensure it does not happen again.

I know who pays, however we pay for all things, like to £100' s of millions of pounds of unopened medicines thrown away each year, or the £1.0m+ wasted by Cumbria Police on that stupid disciplinary matter with the Chief Constable, or the money pee'd away on public sector wages, golden hello's, goodbyes and any other reason we can think to peeing money down the toilet. I rest my case..........

thesilentone wrote:
If theyre suing South Yorkshire Police it is their insurers that will pay out and the premiums will be paid by the ratepayers of South Yorkshire.

But youre right plenty of issues re Cumbria Plod like as you say all the shit re whos running it etc and to that the gagging compensation and not least the money they spent on totally over the top policing of the match v Everton

No mention on deekabout about it?? I missed first part..???

Sent from my GT-I8200N using Tapatalk

I personally don't know anyone that maligned anyone regarding Hillsborough. He allegedly did on social media

markredfox73 wrote:
Just been on Look North.

Thing is he's resigned and rightly so! He's as good as admitted his guilt but to show no remorse just further shows what a disgraceful person he is!
The board should be disgusted with themselves that 3 days later they hadn't the decency to act first and rid the club of such an appalling man! Then again the clubs hierarchy is rotten and we're all a bunch of c**ts!

It's been a sad week for our club when it's been well documented nationwide thanks to Sky and Sky Bet just how thoroughly decent our fans are! Time to move on together and show the world we will not tolerate the behavior shown by anyone and further enhance our reputation of being an excellent group of supporters!

I just can't help but love CUFC and for that reason moving forward I'll follow them away rather than at home until we're rid of the 3 people who continue to let us down!

Will be very disappointed if the headline in tomorrow's N&S; isn't 'Bell End'...

Bluesmad wrote:
Not a mention on the RC Sportsshow Andy Wood was just about to bring it up and that fu cking ar selicker Newton stopped him.

Resigned.

Now for the other 3..

Have you ever been struck in a large crowd outside the ground when the game kicks off?
If you have, you know the pandemonium that results.
The police will also know this, so why did they not delay the kick off?

Trouble was, that in those days it was all about crowd control and not about crowd safety.

Now that there appears to be no evidence of hacking according to Twitter and no police investigation forthcoming it would be nice if Andy Bell could issue a grovelling apology before he f***s off for good!

I was very disappointed that the bookies.com groundboards were not removed before the match on Saturday. Made me feel sick to see them there and made the club look very poor.

Over the weekend looking at the tv and on the net there was some fantastic tributes from other clubs.

Newcastle showed a bit of class with their singing, our club showed total arrogance and lack of empathy leaving those boards up. I found it really sad and something that only felt worse as I saw how other clubs responded.

I don't care if Andy Bell had paid for the groundboards and to be a VP until the end of the season. Surely to goodness their is something in place to say all adverts can be withdrawn if the advertiser does something to bring football or Carlisle United into disrepute.

If there isn't, why the hell isn't there, there damn well should be.

If there is then why the hell wasn't it activated or is our club so far removed from football fans that they really feel the Andy Bell tweets were acceptable?

The clubs response has been very weak to say the least, reflects just as badly on them.

I counted more than twenty images of the Bookies.com logo in the photos for the club's official match report - they obviously don't give at shit whatsoever, not that we didn't know that already mind.

Bumble wrote:
Bumble its not often i agree with what you post but in this case your 100% spot on but youre close enough to the club to have known that this is exactly what would of happened.

They care about nothing but themselves and that carrot of the big payday in the sky that they dream of and seriously need to be taught the error of their ways and without realising it they might just of given us a way of doing it.