Jerry Yates signs on Loan

johnmc wrote: Mullen is the Trump of this board. Had a couple of fair points once many years ago, now just lies repeatedly even when it's obvious he is filing BS.

Wait and see John, I’ve proved you wrong time and time again.

Mullen103 wrote:

johnmc wrote: Mullen is the Trump of this board. Had a couple of fair points once many years ago, now just lies repeatedly even when it's obvious he is filing BS.

Wait and see John, I’ve proved you wrong time and time again.

Have you? Me personally? Another lie on the counter.

Unused sub today

This is the same Mullen who after being shown up again a few weeks ago as full of horse said he wouldn’t be commenting on gossip but at the first chance he’s back with the inside scoop...

Couldn’t make it up.

pie wrote: This is the same Mullen who after being shown up again a few weeks ago as full of horse said he wouldn’t be commenting on gossip but at the first chance he’s back with the inside scoop...

Couldn’t make it up.

I said I wouldn’t start any, what I’ve said been said by others on here that were [censored] and have no money!

As for Yates, I believe we couldn’t afford the wage increase now until we offload.

Mullen103 wrote:

pie wrote: This is the same Mullen who after being shown up again a few weeks ago as full of horse said he wouldn’t be commenting on gossip but at the first chance he’s back with the inside scoop...

Couldn’t make it up.

I said I wouldn’t start any, what I’ve said been said by others on here that were [censored] and have no money!

As for Yates, I believe we couldn’t afford the wage increase now until we offload.

Mullen it had been agreed , just look at the Rotherham squad for todays game, they had youth player stating and filling the bench , not every thing is a conspiracy

Story I’ve been told (by somebody involved at Rotherham) is remarkably similar to what was put out by Carlisle.

Maybe he’s wrong / lying but I’m comfortable there’s nothing more sinister here than Rotherham seeing a lad in good form and wanting him as an option for them at the moment.

Do you really believe this nonsense from Holdworth of this special relationship with Rotherham. He was certain of getting he’s man a few days ago then suddenly changed he’s tune.

Rotherham aren’t bothered about a relationship with us they are bothered about themself and getting the best deal for them.

A couple a weeks ago they wouldn’t of been bothered about loaning us Yates but because he’s scoring and integral to us they probably thought they could get a better deal on wages or even sell him to someone else.

It’s just game playing and you can scour the internet and see Rotherham are good at it.

Anyway didn’t need him today.

I don’t believe a word that comes out of Holdsworths mouth.

However, I do believe the guy at Rotherham who told me Carlisle offered the money needed to extend the loan but Rotherham wanted him for themselves.

As I said, maybe he’s making it up but don’t understand his motive for that.

You’ve obviously heard something different given your comment earlier about that being “the official line”.

I should imagine that most of us have better things to do than scour the internet looking for old stories on Rotherham loan extensions.

Things continue to be a joke off the pitch, but at least be happy that things are going very well on the pitch for crying out loud.

The official lines,yes, was what you’re, club and others are saying, it’s up to others if they believe my opinion or not.

I don’t think we could afford him....yet. If we had everything agreed financially why wasn’t signed and sealed or was it because of this special relationship with Rotherham we agreed to delay and send him back.

As CCU says if he played for Rotherham the only club he could play for again would be us. So not surprised he didn’t come on and especially as they won.

Would I be surprised if he cane back? No but we’d have to pay far more than the first half of the season for him.

FFS Rotherham recalled him because they were short of numbers and still only managed to name 6 subs today. There doesnt have to be a agenda behind everything that happens.

This not the way to run a business and I am certain if and when PD takes over this model will change immediately.

shaldon1 wrote: This not the way to run a business and I am certain if and when PD takes over this model will change immediately.

I suspect EWM are already calling the shots.

Fair play to them, the players, management, admin staff and the whole board, to be breathing down the necks of moneybags like Lincoln, MK Dons, and Mansfield is really good going.

It’s even more impressive considering the shambolic summer, budget cut, and lack of off field vision.

Yes, it may not last if we suffer our usual January window, but maybe, just maybe, Sheridan has lined up some quality forwards to keep us in the play-off place.

For now, we should enjoy FIVE wins on the bounce and give credit where it is due..

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

At it again mullen! Your promise not to post heresay and basically rubbish lasted err..... 2 days was it?

Mullen103 wrote:

johnmc wrote: Mullen is the Trump of this board. Had a couple of fair points once many years ago, now just lies repeatedly even when it's obvious he is filing BS.

Wait and see John, I’ve proved you wrong time and time again.

Mullen you are Fake News

Mullen103 wrote: The official lines,yes, was what you’re, club and others are saying, it’s up to others if they believe my opinion or not.

I don’t think we could afford him....yet. If we had everything agreed financially why wasn’t signed and sealed or was it because of this special relationship with Rotherham we agreed to delay and send him back.

As CCU says if he played for Rotherham the only club he could play for again would be us. So not surprised he didn’t come on and especially as they won.

Would I be surprised if he cane back? No but we’d have to pay far more than the first half of the season for him.

Mullen...you are Fake News

seesaw50 wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: The official lines,yes, was what you’re, club and others are saying, it’s up to others if they believe my opinion or not.

I don’t think we could afford him....yet. If we had everything agreed financially why wasn’t signed and sealed or was it because of this special relationship with Rotherham we agreed to delay and send him back.

As CCU says if he played for Rotherham the only club he could play for again would be us. So not surprised he didn’t come on and especially as they won.

Would I be surprised if he cane back? No but we’d have to pay far more than the first half of the season for him.

Mullen...you are Fake News

So you say

It’s difficult to bet against Mullen as he usually gets it right with his info but as someone said earlier,we have won 5 in a row and scoring a lot of goals.Maybe, just maybe,it’s down to the relative calm that has descended as a result of EWM and the work their guys are doing alongside the existing staff.Time to give all some credit me thinks rather than pick away at negative stuff.

Yes, off topic, but agree if EWM can get professionalism in the club and get us doing well with a shoe string budget then it’s a positive, just imagine what they could do if they did officially took over and put money in.

However there’s loads of rumours about EWM pulling out, the limit reached etc. My opinion is that EWM aren’t pulling out but the agreed limit might be reached and that would mean Jenkins putting in he’s own money again to cover losses. I can’t see him doing that which is why I think team strengthening won’t happen until we offload.

Yes I fell for the trust fake email and the match day anoucher stuff. I believed it, probably because I wanted too. I’ve got a lot right but with all things in life you get remembered for your failures.

My usual source told me about Yates, a couple of days ago In that Rotherham were recalling him and playing silly buggers by asking for more money and the club denied to pay it. Off course it could be bullshit, I’ve never said it’s the official line or true just giving my opinion.

But to be fair to Laffy and even Tashy above. Things behind the scene are shite but the teams performing far better than I’d imagined. It’s probably better to enjoy these 5 wins and big wins and live for the now as they don’t happen very often.

Wait and see I guess.

Once the 'temporary custodians' take us back to where we were when they took over, ie top half of league one, then the missing supporters may start to feel some positivity. That said, well done to the manager and players for five wins on the trot, keep up the good form.

Laffy wrote: It’s difficult to bet against Mullen as he usually gets it right with his info but as someone said earlier,we have won 5 in a row and scoring a lot of goals.Maybe, just maybe,it’s down to the relative calm that has descended as a result of EWM and the work their guys are doing alongside the existing staff.Time to give all some credit me thinks rather than pick away at negative stuff.

We can all get carried away at Christmas. Slow down on the sherry old boy.

Not getting carried away Pie but I will always give credit when due-this team has some momentum and I was one of the biggest detractors earlier this season.

A successful team on the pitch will open up all sorts of avenues for the Club

I’m pleased you’re feeling positive again Laffy and not hoping we get beat in games anymore.

pie wrote:

Laffy wrote: It’s difficult to bet against Mullen as he usually gets it right with his info but as someone said earlier,we have won 5 in a row and scoring a lot of goals.Maybe, just maybe,it’s down to the relative calm that has descended as a result of EWM and the work their guys are doing alongside the existing staff.Time to give all some credit me thinks rather than pick away at negative stuff.

We can all get carried away at Christmas. Slow down on the sherry old boy.

Oh pie, pie, pie, pie and pie

I got two things horrendously wrong yes but....

When I mentioned Laffy getting involved. Was told it was shite.

When I mentioned EWM/DAY loaning the club money as we were in the shit. Was told it was shite.

When I mentioned EWM took over/effectively running things. Was told it was shite.

There’s others too, but as I say you get remembered for your failures.

And yes while we’re at it on the football side about Stockton and Cosgrove. Again told i was talking shite, stats prove otherwise.

But the teams doing well concentrate on that.

Mullen103 wrote:

pie wrote:

Laffy wrote: It’s difficult to bet against Mullen as he usually gets it right with his info but as someone said earlier,we have won 5 in a row and scoring a lot of goals.Maybe, just maybe,it’s down to the relative calm that has descended as a result of EWM and the work their guys are doing alongside the existing staff.Time to give all some credit me thinks rather than pick away at negative stuff.

We can all get carried away at Christmas. Slow down on the sherry old boy.

Oh pie, pie, pie, pie and pie

I got two things horrendously wrong yes but....

When I mentioned Laffy getting involved. Was told it was shite.

When I mentioned EWM/DAY loaning the club money as we were in the shit. Was told it was shite.

When I mentioned EWM took over/effectively running things. Was told it was shite.

There’s others too, but as I say you get remembered for your failures.

And yes while we’re at it on the football side about Stockton and Cosgrove. Again told i was talking shite, stats prove otherwise.

But the teams doing well concentrate on that.

You also said on here after the FA cup exit that the season was over before January. Turned out to be a load of nonsense that didn’t it?

chedderbob247 wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

pie wrote:

Laffy wrote: It’s difficult to bet against Mullen as he usually gets it right with his info but as someone said earlier,we have won 5 in a row and scoring a lot of goals.Maybe, just maybe,it’s down to the relative calm that has descended as a result of EWM and the work their guys are doing alongside the existing staff.Time to give all some credit me thinks rather than pick away at negative stuff.

We can all get carried away at Christmas. Slow down on the sherry old boy.

Oh pie, pie, pie, pie and pie

I got two things horrendously wrong yes but....

When I mentioned Laffy getting involved. Was told it was shite.

When I mentioned EWM/DAY loaning the club money as we were in the shit. Was told it was shite.

When I mentioned EWM took over/effectively running things. Was told it was shite.

There’s others too, but as I say you get remembered for your failures.

And yes while we’re at it on the football side about Stockton and Cosgrove. Again told i was talking shite, stats prove otherwise.

But the teams doing well concentrate on that.

You also said on here after the FA cup exit that the season was over before January. Turned out to be a load of nonsense that didn’t it?

It is really, well maybe another month of sort of excitement.

5 wins were needed just to get in the mix.

Mullen103 wrote: Do you really believe this nonsense from Holdworth of this special relationship with Rotherham. He was certain of getting he’s man a few days ago then suddenly changed he’s tune.

Rotherham aren’t bothered about a relationship with us they are bothered about themself and getting the best deal for them.

A couple a weeks ago they wouldn’t of been bothered about loaning us Yates but because he’s scoring and integral to us they probably thought they could get a better deal on wages or even sell him to someone else.

It’s just game playing and you can scour the internet and see Rotherham are good at it.

Anyway didn’t need him today.

Well you never clearly state anything you make a vague comment and then use anything and claim it was related to that ,your technique is more throwing sh?t against the fan hoping some will stick. yes you do get a lot right but you also get a lot wrong.

I state quite a lot happy, yes I admit I’ve been vague on this because it would get shot down anyway.

I admit I’ve got things wrong but I admit it. Yes I’ve got things right as well but those that say it was shite/bollocks don’t admit their wrong either. It works both ways!

I’ll be more thorough next time happy. Although it’s probably not worth the trouble in posting anything.

Bench again for Jerry Yates ?.... ....surprised nobody's mentioned it.
Coz we're out I tend not to take much notice of cup fixtures.
Glad Lincoln got dumped out tho

Oh blimey...of course

Not even on the bench today, can't imagine he'll be pleased about that after getting regular games for us. He was just finding good form.

Cup tied

Doh! forgot about that.

CCU wrote: Have a job, he’s Cup-Tied, having played for us at Crewe and Lincoln...

Rotherham United ✔ @OfficialRUFC

TEAM v @ManCity | Rodak; Vyner, Ajayi, Robertson, Mattock; Forde, Vaulks, Wiles, Taylor; Williams, Smith. SUBS | P… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

06 Jan 2026 13:00

71 Retweets 354 favorites

• Reply
• Retweet
• Favorite

This makes me believe the official view as I’m sure Rotherham wouldn’t want Yeats cup tied if they had any intention of recalling him unless they had a emergency situation Fleetwood didn’t want Nadesan cup tied not only he could play for them but is worth a few more quid if he’s not cup tied if he are going to sell him

I admire your faith!

Mouldy wrote: I reckon he’ll be back before end of January

Could have him tomorrow if we pay what Rotherham want.

Rotherham’s struggling big time financially, losing a lot of money. Their owners main aim is to stop it at all costs so any penny pinching is a bonus. Yates isn’t likely in their managers plans, albeit yes their struggling, but Rotherham’s main aim is money/saving money. Give them what they want and we have him regardless.

Mullen103 wrote:

Mouldy wrote: I reckon he’ll be back before end of January

Could have him tomorrow if we pay what Rotherham want.

Rotherham’s struggling big time financially, losing a lot of money. Their owners main aim is to stop it at all costs so any penny pinching is a bonus. Yates isn’t likely in their managers plans, albeit yes their struggling, but Rotherham’s main aim is money/saving money. Give them what they want and we have him regardless.

Football fortune due after yesterday

Mullen103 wrote:

Mouldy wrote: I reckon he’ll be back before end of January

Could have him tomorrow if we pay what Rotherham want.

Rotherham’s struggling big time financially, losing a lot of money. Their owners main aim is to stop it at all costs so any penny pinching is a bonus. Yates isn’t likely in their managers plans, albeit yes their struggling, but Rotherham’s main aim is money/saving money. Give them what they want and we have him regardless.

why don’t you pay Rotherham what they want

If there's a sell on clause tell Rotherham they can have it in exchange for Yates

MerseysideBlue wrote: Worth noting reports are that Rotherham are after Cosgrove from Aberdeen!

Can't be, Mullen says they are skint and only interested in cutting costs, and he's never wrong.

DeckchairBlue wrote:

MerseysideBlue wrote: Worth noting reports are that Rotherham are after Cosgrove from Aberdeen!

Can't be, Mullen says they are skint and only interested in cutting costs, and he's never wrong.

This the same Cosgrove 90% on here said wasn’t good enough and Stockton was better and score more goals.

Loan if there’s any truth in it I guess

cocaineblues wrote:

DeckchairBlue wrote:

MerseysideBlue wrote: Worth noting reports are that Rotherham are after Cosgrove from Aberdeen!

Can't be, Mullen says they are skint and only interested in cutting costs, and he's never wrong.

Post edited by Admin

Ban?