Jerry Yates signs on Loan

Like bloody busses.

This is a better signing on paper for me like Adam Collin.

We probably only got him as maybe they didn't think he was ready yet for The Championship.

Only 21 I notice so we are definitely going for youth this time round under Sheridan so this could be interesting.

I have to admit I've never heard of either of them. Do we need inexperienced kids in our impending relegation battle?

What a useless signing that is

40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

I guess the positive side is he can't be any worse than Bennett or Stockton. I see he's only 5'7 though so he could be the new Asamoah.

A season long loan would have been better if he turns out to be any good, we could lose him at a vital time.

No exactly prolific is he.

nobbyblue wrote: No exactly prolific is he.

Would they be loaning him out if he was prolific?

Wukkie wrote: I guess the positive side is he can't be any worse than Bennett or Stockton. I see he's only 5'7 though so he could be the new Asamoah.

Rotherham fans say he’s slow so won’t be the new Asamoah.

Fleetwood seen how good Nadesan was when they obviously had him watched, that is the problem when you take a young or out of favour player and they shine for you as they want them back then, would have been better to take these players on a contract when they are out of favour and if you had scouted them well enough you would know what you are getting.

Rotherham have Jamie Proctor but not sure how near to fitness he is or good enough for The Championship either as he may come back not the same player.

I would take him back in a flash but even if he in nowhere near the 4k a week reported wage we would not be able to match what he wanted.

Dancingbear wrote: 40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

Never got this thing about having played a few games at a higher level and he must be good. We had some terrible players in League One.

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote: 40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

Never got this thing about having played a few games at a higher level and he must be good. We had some terrible players in League One.

Getting to the stage where owt is better than nowt though.

Just hope we actually sign some players as well, getting silly now on that front, the board are taking the piss.

Promising deal by the sounds of it. Maybe ready to really prove himself as a decent player like Nadesan was last year. Clear that Rotherham rate him given it’s only six months.

Wukkie wrote: I guess the positive side is he can't be any worse than Bennett or Stockton. I see he's only 5'7 though so he could be the new Asamoah.

He is not 5'7 he is nearly 5'9

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

nobbyblue wrote: No exactly prolific is he.

5 goals in 10 games on loan at Harrogate!

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote: 40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

Never got this thing about having played a few games at a higher level and he must be good. We had some terrible players in League One.

It was a reference to him being inexperienced. I agree on us having plenty crap players in league 1 but you’d think in a promotion season there wouldn’t be too many getting a game if they were shit.

Dancingbear wrote:

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote: 40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

Never got this thing about having played a few games at a higher level and he must be good. We had some terrible players in League One.

It was a reference to him being inexperienced. I agree on us having plenty crap players in league 1 but you’d think in a promotion season there wouldn’t be too many getting a game if they were shit.

I'm not being pedantic here but he only started 7 league games and was subbed in them all (some very early) so his contribution to the promotion season wasn't great.

I don’t know what people expect from a young loan player.

“He only played x amount of games for them last season”

If he’d been a first team regular in a promotion winning team they wouldn’t be loaning him out to League 2.

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote:

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote: 40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

Never got this thing about having played a few games at a higher level and he must be good. We had some terrible players in League One.

It was a reference to him being inexperienced. I agree on us having plenty crap players in league 1 but you’d think in a promotion season there wouldn’t be too many getting a game if they were shit.

I'm not being pedantic here but he only started 7 league games and was subbed in them all (some very early) so his contribution to the promotion season wasn't great.

More importantly what does your mate at Harrogate railway or wherever he was on loan think of him

Considering Ashley Nadesan was nowhere near a mid-table league 1 teams squad when he came here, I feel a player who was a lot closer to a promotion winning team in league 1 may not be so bad.

Dancingbear wrote:

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote:

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote: 40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

Never got this thing about having played a few games at a higher level and he must be good. We had some terrible players in League One.

It was a reference to him being inexperienced. I agree on us having plenty crap players in league 1 but you’d think in a promotion season there wouldn’t be too many getting a game if they were shit.

I'm not being pedantic here but he only started 7 league games and was subbed in them all (some very early) so his contribution to the promotion season wasn't great.

More importantly what does your mate at Harrogate railway or wherever he was on loan think of him

He says he's very good. Like a young Mark Beck.

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote:

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote:

nobbyblue wrote:

Dancingbear wrote: 40 games in two leagues above us in last two seasons isnt too bad going. Especially in a promotion winning team. If he can find his scoring boots he'll be a good accusition.

Never got this thing about having played a few games at a higher level and he must be good. We had some terrible players in League One.

It was a reference to him being inexperienced. I agree on us having plenty crap players in league 1 but you’d think in a promotion season there wouldn’t be too many getting a game if they were shit.

I'm not being pedantic here but he only started 7 league games and was subbed in them all (some very early) so his contribution to the promotion season wasn't great.

More importantly what does your mate at Harrogate railway or wherever he was on loan think of him

He says he's very good. Like a young Mark Beck.

Not much in their heading ability probably.

Yates recalled? Anyone else heard this

No mention on Rotherham twitter feed.

It is on Official site now

Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Oh bugger.
Back to the loan tombola.
More excellent directing of football by Hioldsworth.

Because they intend to play him
Hence the recall I think

We had agreed terms but he's their player so they can recall him

Yates gone and Nadesan going. That'll be the end of our good form then.

Great pity, one of our most exciting players.

Lets be careful here, we don't want to go being all successful and that like eh! Non of that play off talk or promotion crack................

Devastating news. He was our most skilful player since Tom Lawrence. But thanks Jerry for what you did for us.

CCU wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Financial side was all agreed...

Yes: so the official line says.

Expect January to an horrendous month.

That’s the problem with building a team around players that don’t belong to you.

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Financial side was all agreed...

Yes: so the official line says.

Expect January to an horrendous month.

You will be having a top day though, won’t you. Anything to worsen the club and you are happy as Larry.

Expect Yates to be back later in the month is my view.

chedderbob247 wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Financial side was all agreed...

Yes: so the official line says.

Expect January to an horrendous month.

You will be having a top day though, won’t you. Anything to worsen the club and you are happy as Larry.

Expect Yates to be back later in the month is my view.

Not if he comes on and bangs in a couple!

Ah but hasn’t JS got a cunning plan for January?

chedderbob247 wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Financial side was all agreed...

Yes: so the official line says.

Expect January to an horrendous month.

You will be having a top day though, won’t you. Anything to worsen the club and you are happy as Larry.

Expect Yates to be back later in the month is my view.

If we don’t have to pay then yes.

We can’t afford £40 for a toilet door lock, so any increase in Yates wages it was a no for now.

If you’re up to your limit on the EWM loan and Jenkins says no more than it’s no wonder the likes of Bennett, albeit he’s tat, and Jones have to go to free up money for pointless 6 month loan deals.

As I say I expect January to be poor and any chance of promotion gone quickly. Enjoy today.

Mullen103 wrote:

chedderbob247 wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Financial side was all agreed...

Yes: so the official line says.

Expect January to an horrendous month.

You will be having a top day though, won’t you. Anything to worsen the club and you are happy as Larry.

Expect Yates to be back later in the month is my view.

If we don’t have to pay then yes.

We can’t afford £40 for a toilet door lock, so any increase in Yates wages it was a no for now.

If you’re up to your limit on the EWM loan and Jenkins says no more than it’s no wonder the likes of Bennett, albeit he’s tat, and Jones have to go to free up money for pointless 6 month loan deals.

As I say I expect January to be poor and any chance of promotion gone quickly. Enjoy today.

Mullen he's wasn't recalled as we can't afford his wages that had all be agreed , the reason he was recalled is Rotherham have no players looks at their team today they have a significant number of youth players in their squad,

I heard he was recalled because a unicorn was killed and the princess got annoyed with Jenkins and Nixon at her castle. That’s what I heard.

Happyblue wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

chedderbob247 wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Financial side was all agreed...

Yes: so the official line says.

Expect January to an horrendous month.

You will be having a top day though, won’t you. Anything to worsen the club and you are happy as Larry.

Expect Yates to be back later in the month is my view.

If we don’t have to pay then yes.

We can’t afford £40 for a toilet door lock, so any increase in Yates wages it was a no for now.

If you’re up to your limit on the EWM loan and Jenkins says no more than it’s no wonder the likes of Bennett, albeit he’s tat, and Jones have to go to free up money for pointless 6 month loan deals.

As I say I expect January to be poor and any chance of promotion gone quickly. Enjoy today.

Mullen he's wasn't recalled as we can't afford his wages that had all be agreed , the reason he was recalled is Rotherham have no players looks at their team today they have a significant number of youth players in their squad,

Yes so they say.

Wait and see what happens in January.

Mullen103 wrote:

chedderbob247 wrote:

Mullen103 wrote:

CCU wrote:

Mullen103 wrote: Recalled apparently as we won’t stump up a percentage of he’s wage.

Financial side was all agreed...

Yes: so the official line says.

Expect January to an horrendous month.

You will be having a top day though, won’t you. Anything to worsen the club and you are happy as Larry.

Expect Yates to be back later in the month is my view.

If we don’t have to pay then yes.

We can’t afford £40 for a toilet door lock, so any increase in Yates wages it was a no for now.

If you’re up to your limit on the EWM loan and Jenkins says no more than it’s no wonder the likes of Bennett, albeit he’s tat, and Jones have to go to free up money for pointless 6 month loan deals.

As I say I expect January to be poor and any chance of promotion gone quickly. Enjoy today.

Not only do you expect it, you are practically praying for it to happen.

Mullen is the Trump of this board. Had a couple of fair points once many years ago, now just lies repeatedly even when it's obvious he is filing BS.