franksidebottom wrote:
What difference does it make if he's a fan or not? He's there to do a job, similar to what the players are there to do and most of them aren't fans. For what it's worth I think he's pretty good in what I would imagine is a pretty tough job. His interview with Curle was quite good after today's game, some decent questions which Curle tried to dodge and turn around on him, poor from KC really. It's okay for Curle to slam him for being negative but on the back of four poorish performances and a defence which seems to be getting worse by the week it's hard not to be negative.
So whats the point in trying to rile Curle if youre gonna back down the minute Curle shows a bit of Spunk or in just asking the same question over and over i was taught you ask it three times and then move on and ask another equally probing but totally unrelated one to illicit the most dramatic response which is what he gets paid for.
Good example is Andrew Neil he asks some great sarcastic questions designed to do nothing other than wind the interviewee up but when he goes on and on repeating the same question over and over again all it does is piss the viewer off and show that Neils not half as clever as he thinks that he is.