- Posts: 9324
- Likes received: 1938
JuanKerzov wrote: Coast, other than Barra, will have no connect services.
Carlisle/Ncl ones will be re-furbed 158’s.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
High Street wrote: I don’t think 158s are allowed round the coast either. The entire country’s diesel fleets are in limbo until Great Western electrification and Glasgow-Edinburgh electrification is complete. A mess created,funded and caused by DafT. Of course it’s easy for them to hide behind those nasty TOCs which aren’t going to complain too much as they’ll be bidding for more franchises soon.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
JuanKerzov wrote: Coast, other than Barra, will have no connect services.
Carlisle/Ncl ones will be re-furbed 158’s.
Fasts will be the new ones slows will be 158.s on Newc - Carl
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JuanKerzov wrote:
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
JuanKerzov wrote: Coast, other than Barra, will have no connect services.
Carlisle/Ncl ones will be re-furbed 158’s.
Fasts will be the new ones slows will be 158.s on Newc - Carl
Connects will all be ‘fasts’ and all be 158’s.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
JuanKerzov wrote:
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
JuanKerzov wrote: Coast, other than Barra, will have no connect services.
Carlisle/Ncl ones will be re-furbed 158’s.
Fasts will be the new ones slows will be 158.s on Newc - Carl
Connects will all be ‘fasts’ and all be 158’s.
Read their franchise bid all connect services will be provided by the new stock
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
High Street wrote: I don’t think 158s are allowed round the coast either. The entire country’s diesel fleets are in limbo until Great Western electrification and Glasgow-Edinburgh electrification is complete. A mess created,funded and caused by DafT. Of course it’s easy for them to hide behind those nasty TOCs which aren’t going to complain too much as they’ll be bidding for more franchises soon.
Ah, didnt realize that. Looks like options are pretty limited Maybe they should be looking at some out of the box solution
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
High Street wrote:
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
High Street wrote: I don’t think 158s are allowed round the coast either. The entire country’s diesel fleets are in limbo until Great Western electrification and Glasgow-Edinburgh electrification is complete. A mess created,funded and caused by DafT. Of course it’s easy for them to hide behind those nasty TOCs which aren’t going to complain too much as they’ll be bidding for more franchises soon.
Ah, didnt realize that. Looks like options are pretty limited Maybe they should be looking at some out of the box solution
They did.........
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JuanKerzov wrote:
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
JuanKerzov wrote:
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
JuanKerzov wrote: Coast, other than Barra, will have no connect services.
Carlisle/Ncl ones will be re-furbed 158’s.
Fasts will be the new ones slows will be 158.s on Newc - Carl
Connects will all be ‘fasts’ and all be 158’s.
Read their franchise bid all connect services will be provided by the new stock
Haha, dare say I’ve studied it a bit more than most!
Connects between Carlisle-Ncl-Boro will be 158’s
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JuanKerzov wrote: The former MD told the N&S last year they would be re-furbs, the DfT say of Newcastle to Carlisle -
‘...half-hourly service between Newcastle and Carlisle, providing 28 trains per day in each direction – 13 more than now. Some services will be faster than today, at around 80 minutes
a minimum of 10 services each way will operate as “Northern Connect” services, operated by fully refurbished trains...’
I’ll be driving them, they’ll be 158’s.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JuanKerzov wrote: The former MD told the N&S last year they would be re-furbs, the DfT say of Newcastle to Carlisle -
‘...half-hourly service between Newcastle and Carlisle, providing 28 trains per day in each direction – 13 more than now. Some services will be faster than today, at around 80 minutes
a minimum of 10 services each way will operate as “Northern Connect” services, operated by fully refurbished trains...’
I’ll be driving them, they’ll be 158’s.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
High Street wrote:
NORTHERNSOUL wrote:
High Street wrote: I don’t think 158s are allowed round the coast either. The entire country’s diesel fleets are in limbo until Great Western electrification and Glasgow-Edinburgh electrification is complete. A mess created,funded and caused by DafT. Of course it’s easy for them to hide behind those nasty TOCs which aren’t going to complain too much as they’ll be bidding for more franchises soon.
Ah, didnt realize that. Looks like options are pretty limited Maybe they should be looking at some out of the box solution
They did.........
And should be admitting they all got it wrong and be looking for a solution that works
Where can you see what stock is passed for that line and what isnt. ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JuanKerzov wrote: The former MD told the N&S last year they would be re-furbs, the DfT say of Newcastle to Carlisle -
‘...half-hourly service between Newcastle and Carlisle, providing 28 trains per day in each direction – 13 more than now. Some services will be faster than today, at around 80 minutes
a minimum of 10 services each way will operate as “Northern Connect” services, operated by fully refurbished trains...’
I’ll be driving them, they’ll be 158’s.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
High Street wrote:
JuanKerzov wrote: The former MD told the N&S last year they would be re-furbs, the DfT say of Newcastle to Carlisle -
‘...half-hourly service between Newcastle and Carlisle, providing 28 trains per day in each direction – 13 more than now. Some services will be faster than today, at around 80 minutes
a minimum of 10 services each way will operate as “Northern Connect” services, operated by fully refurbished trains...’
I’ll be driving them, they’ll be 158’s.
Which is still pretty shit for 70 miles
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
CCU wrote: Far far far too many types of stock on our railways these days IMO...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
carwash wrote:
CCU wrote: Far far far too many types of stock on our railways these days IMO...
True, you wouldn't design a railway like this. All the efficient airlines like Ryanair, Easyjet and Wizzair operate more or less single types of airliner because it makes training, maintenance etc more straightforward.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
thesilentone wrote: Must be early Christmas shopping..........
Bosses at the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant have ‘gone cold’ on the possibility of a pay deal as a one day strike by more than 1,100 craft workers on Tuesday (7 November) is set to go-ahead.
Unite, the country’s largest union which represents maintenance staff and electricians, said that the management had now ‘gone cold’ on talks after a round of ‘positive talks’ – and the union blamed ‘the unseen hand’ of government ministers for the intransigence.
The 24 hour strike is due start at 06.00 on Tuesday over the ‘completely unacceptable’ 1.5 per cent pay offer imposed by Sellafield Ltd – a Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) company – in September, backdated to 1 April.
Unite said that it would be maintaining a skeleton staff during the strike to reassure the people of Cumbria on health and safety issues.
Unite regional officer Graham Williams said: “The Sellafield bosses appear to have adopted a new hardline attitude on the pay talks which we believe is being orchestrated by the unseen hands of government ministers who are pulling the strings behind the scenes.
“We had talks with management on 23 October which were very positive, but a week later the atmosphere had dramatically changed – it was as if the shutters had come down.
“Our members are highly trained and not prepared to accept such a derisory offer as the consumer prices index (CPI) inflation rose to 3.0 per cent in September. Inflation is eroding our members’ take-home pay.
“This has to be seen in the context that the Sellafield workforce has delivered over £230 million of savings in the last two years and is expected to make a further £300 million in savings this year.
“The strike will mean that no on-going maintenance work by our members will take place at Sellafield, but to reassure the Cumbrian public we will be maintaining a skeleton staff on site.
“Tuesday’s strike is a shot across the bows and more strikes are on the cards in the run-up to Christmas, if the management does not engage in constructive talks.”
A spokesman for Sellafield Ltd said: “As always, the safety and security of the Sellafield site, our workforce and the community are our priorities during this industrial action.
“We are working with Cumbria Police and Cumbria County Council’s Highways team to try to minimise disruption.
“However, strikes by their nature are designed to cause disruption and people should expect traffic problems while pickets are in place.
“We have taken all steps available to us to minimise disruption including opening all access gates and advising staff on steps they can take to help.”
The strike follows a ballot of its craft members which saw 90 per cent vote for strikes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
WHY AM I STRIKING?
In this letter, I hope to give an insight into why train guards are striking and what we as guards actually do. My own parents think I ‘just clip tickets’, so I am facing an uphill struggle from the word go! We are not looking for more money, despite popular belief! And this letter does not seek to slander any particular company.
We are striking because some train companies are trying to remove the guard as being ‘safety critical’ on the train. There is a lot of clever spin around the difference between ‘safety critical’ and ‘safety trained’. At a lot of train companies in the UK, the guard is ‘safety critical’. This means that we are trained for three months and regularly reassessed in order to get our conductor license.
We safely dispatch trains, ensuring doors are closed, no one is trapped/could be trapped, the signal is the right colour, it’s the right time plus a lot more.
Also, we provide customer service: everything from printing journey timetables to selling and checking tickets to helping disabled passengers and getting buggies/bikes on/off.
And we do everything else in between; from working various types of trains, fixing faults, having good route knowledge, knowing where/when/how to evacuate in an emergency and undertaking security checks for anything out of the ordinary.
Demotion to ‘safety trained’ removes a lot of our current role, including train dispatching. It means companies can run as many trains as they like without a guard on. This is also known as Driver-Only Operation (DOO). New trains currently being built will have cameras on platforms or in the front cab. This means the driver will be able to dispatch a train on their own, or possibly with a dispatcher at larger stations.
But this letter is not an attack on our drivers. There are statistics and reports available online from various safety organisations and the RMT, in addition to our own view, that show it isn’t safe to dispatch a train without a guard on. We do this job every day. And we fully believe you need two sets of eyes to dispatch a train. Not one person looking at small CCTV screens, even if it is ‘new technology.’
Currently when we dispatch, we view the train/platform and ensure no one is trapped in doors etc. The guard stops the train in emergency if someone is in danger. For example, if someone runs for the train, loses their footing and then becomes trapped. Who is going to be driving the train forward when the driver is checking the screens, or vice versa?
We have seen what has happened at certain companies. So, we believe removing us as ‘safety critical’ is the start of a slippery slope to DOO, with only one member of staff on board each train. This would then remove all the customer service elements too, and assisting disabled passengers. I know people argue DOO works fine in London and commuter areas. But my response to that is that rural stations, of which there are a lot outside the capital, don’t usually have staff.
In London, if someone is threatening on a train it is only about two minutes to the next stop. And there will be police there already when you arrive. But across a lot of the country, the guard is the deterrent for a lot of anti-social, and all sorts of behaviour. As I’ve seen as a guard when someone was threatening towards a woman travelling alone, what were her choices? Get off the train at the next rural, partially lit station alone, panicked? Or maybe try and find a friendly stranger to help? That friendly stranger who should always be on the train in this case was the guard. I removed her from that situation, called the police and made sure she got home safely. This is not uncommon. These people are our daughters/brothers/grandparents.
At these remote stations with no staff there is also no one to help assist a disabled passenger on and off. Accessibility for all passengers is a big issue that we feel strongly about. Along my routes, there are people who rely on us getting the ramp out and assisting them at their station. It’s part of their way of life. They don’t want to pre-book 24 hours in advance if they need to pop to the next town to buy nappies. And why should they? Why can’t all passengers just be able to turn up at a station and travel spontaneously if they want to?
We know nothing stands still forever, but why should new trains mean passenger safety moves backwards? And don’t get me started on the fantastic wonderland that could potentially be, if we had new trains AND guards AND funding for much needed network improvements. But that’s for another day.
I don’t speak for everyone, but most of us love our jobs! We love meeting new people every day and having conversations with interesting strangers at 2 o’clock on a Thursday afternoon about their lives! We like helping people get their bags off the train – I always imagine every elderly passenger is my own Nan! Despite the fact it makes us groan in our heads sometimes (just being honest) we do still try and smile. Even when we tell the 20th person in two minutes that yes, this is the xx:xx train to x.
I for one, don’t enjoy leaving people on the platform who have run late for a train. We see great sunsets from the back cab and cracking sunrises at 4am when everyone is asleep. We have regular passengers who will always say hello. And we have not so chirpy passengers who we do our best to try and explain delays to. We’ve grown up waving at trains ourselves, and now take great delight in waving to small children from the train as we pass, or handing out stickers and seeing their faces light up.
We want people on the trains. Real humans with empathy and logic and compassion. We know we have rules to follow that can be unpopular, like I’m sure you do in your workplace. But, and I may be mocked for getting a little too deep here, I want more people in my everyday life. Not more machines or automated voices!
The railway is quite a unique place to work. We often joke a lot of us are misfits who wouldn’t really fit in anywhere else. Most of you might be surprised to know a lot of ex-forces people work as guards and drivers. I don’t know the exact figures but for the ex-forces men and women I know on the railway, this place was a home for them and their skills. And like most of us, they hoped if they worked hard they would have a job for life on the railway if they wanted it.
So, I hope you have a little insight now into why most of us are striking. And it may answer some questions for you about what we do and why we are trying to carry on doing it.
See you soon, on the trains – hopefully.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
thesilentone wrote: Since when did anyone in a Rail Union give a shxte about anyone but themselves ?
It starts at the top and works down.
Closed shop Champagne Socialists !!
Sellafield is already screwing it up for local Companies who cannot compete with the high pay levels, and they are striking for
Pure Greed !!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
High Street wrote: That spitting quote is a quite (in)famous one from Bob Crow. Who has been dead several years.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
thesilentone wrote: I'll give you a source, do you think there is likely to be any resignations ?
carolineleneghan.wordpress.com/2013/03/08/3/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Laffy wrote: Strike off-28pc pay rise
Amazing
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
newcarlislefan wrote: Come on you miserable sods out there! Surely we want everybody to be paid fairly from the bin man, to the nurse, to the solicitor to the banker to the boss?
5% a year over 5 years feels to me like the kind of deal that people should fairly be offered whatever their role in life.
I don't get that and I'd love to! Infact I had a pay cut last year as I'm self employed but I'm happy that people are being paid fairly. I wish the average worker in this country could be paid fairly with good pay rises.
The guy who runs Southern Rail earns 2.16 million. His pay went up from 1.96 million a year so I think that's a £200,000 a year pay rise. So, that's around 10% a year or 50% over 5 years or there or thereabouts. Personally, I think it's obscene but if he's doing a good job then you could argue he deserves it. Surely Southern Rail is a roaring success then? Form the Indy - "The network he operates has the worst punctuality record of any franchise in the country, with almost one in five trains late. The Southern rail owner runs the five worst performing lines in the country, including the nation's least punctual train line, the premium-priced "Gatwick Express".
The company makes £100 million pounds a year profit. 100 million pounds profit! If they can afford to pay the boss over 2 million surely they can afford to pay the guards an extra 5% a year? If the boss gets 10% and £200,000 extra can't the workers get 5%? Surely that's just fair?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Dancingbear wrote:
newcarlislefan wrote: Come on you miserable sods out there! Surely we want everybody to be paid fairly from the bin man, to the nurse, to the solicitor to the banker to the boss?
5% a year over 5 years feels to me like the kind of deal that people should fairly be offered whatever their role in life.
I don't get that and I'd love to! Infact I had a pay cut last year as I'm self employed but I'm happy that people are being paid fairly. I wish the average worker in this country could be paid fairly with good pay rises.
The guy who runs Southern Rail earns 2.16 million. His pay went up from 1.96 million a year so I think that's a £200,000 a year pay rise. So, that's around 10% a year or 50% over 5 years or there or thereabouts. Personally, I think it's obscene but if he's doing a good job then you could argue he deserves it. Surely Southern Rail is a roaring success then? Form the Indy - "The network he operates has the worst punctuality record of any franchise in the country, with almost one in five trains late. The Southern rail owner runs the five worst performing lines in the country, including the nation's least punctual train line, the premium-priced "Gatwick Express".
The company makes £100 million pounds a year profit. 100 million pounds profit! If they can afford to pay the boss over 2 million surely they can afford to pay the guards an extra 5% a year? If the boss gets 10% and £200,000 extra can't the workers get 5%? Surely that's just fair?
I think the guards would accept less than ASLEF have been bought out for if they guarantee to put a conductor on the trains.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Laffy wrote: I was in the central line tube last week-absolute crowding like you wouldn’t believe.Yet no conductor on what I saw as a very dangerous scrum to get on and off.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Laffy wrote: Couldn’t see in the melee-the fact is tube train drivers have good cameras and can talk to their passengers-no conductor other than the odd guy checking tickets.
The RMT have a history of striking-though a pity Bob Crow wasn’t around to sort this out.I rather liked him despite his left wing politics-though he was anti EU.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Dancingbear wrote: Yep ASLEF have sold out the RMT for a bit of extra cash.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
newcarlislefan wrote: The company makes £100 million pounds a year profit. 100 million pounds profit! It's not exactly struggling.
The chief executive gets a yearly pay rise of 10%. He will make £200,000 extra this year and will somehow have to make do with 2.16 million pounds this year.
I would say a 10% pay rise is a generous one in one year, or 50% across 5 years. The guards get 28% over 5 years.
The guards will now get a yearly pay rise half of what the chief executive has received. Their pay rise equates to 5% a year. This is half the pay rise the chief exec gets.
Wouldn't it be even fairer to all employees to get the same rise whether at the top or the bottom?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
